The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mobility as a Service: A Critical Review of Definitions, Assessments of Schemes, and Key Challenges
Open accessAbstract
Mobility as a Service (MaaS) is a recent innovative transport concept, anticipated to induce significant changes in the current transport practices. However, there is ambiguity surrounding the concept; it is uncertain what are the core characteristics of MaaS and in which way they can be addressed. Further, there is a lack of an assessment framework to classify their unique characteristics in a systematic manner, even though several MaaS schemes have been implemented around the world. In this study, we define this set of attributes through a literature review, which is then used to describe selected MaaS schemes and existing applications. We also examine the potential implications of the identified core characteristics of the service on the following three areas of transport practices: travel demand modelling, a supply-side analysis, and designing business model. Finally, we propose the necessary enhancements needed to deliver such an innovative service like MaaS, by establishing the state of art in those fields.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy
Becker, W. E., Shapiro, C., & Varian, H. R. (1999) · The Journal of Economic Education · doi:10.2307/1183273 · Cited by 2,557
Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework
Gawer, A. (2014) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.006 · Cited by 1,869 · cited 4×
“Technically, integration of services may be realised by using so-called platform technology, which facilitates interactions between trav-ellers and suppliers of transport services in an improved or smarter way (Ballon, 2009; Gawer, 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialSmart card data use in public transit: A literature review
Pelletier, M.-P., Trépanier, M., & Morency, C. (2011) · Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2010.12.003 · Cited by 924
(2015) · Transportation Research Board 94th Annual MeetingTransportation Research Board · Cited by 854
Hagiu, A., & Wright, J. (2015) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2014.2042 · Cited by 777
A Critical Review of New Mobility Services for Urban Transport
Kamargianni, M., Li, W., Matyas, M., & Schäfer, A. (2016) · Transportation Research Procedia · doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.277 · Cited by 559
A Random Regret-Minimization model of travel choice
Chorus, C. G., Arentze, T. A., & Timmermans, H. J. P. (2008) · Transportation Research Part B: Methodological · doi:10.1016/j.trb.2007.05.004 · Cited by 364
Activity-based models of travel demand: promises, progress and prospects
Rasouli, S., & Timmermans, H. (2014) · International Journal of Urban Sciences · doi:10.1080/12265934.2013.835118 · Cited by 321
Mahmoudi, M., & Zhou, X. (2016) · Transportation Research Part B: Methodological · doi:10.1016/j.trb.2016.03.009 · Cited by 316
Cited by
Questioning mobility as a service: Unanticipated implications for society and governance
Pangbourne, K., Mladenović, M. N., Stead, D., & Milakis, D. (2020) · Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2019.09.033 · Cited by 304
Alonso-González, M. J., Hoogendoorn-Lanser, S., van Oort, N., Cats, O., & Hoogendoorn, S. (2020) · Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2019.11.022 · Cited by 283
Singleton, P. A. (2019) · Travel Behaviour and Society · doi:10.1016/j.tbs.2018.02.005 · Cited by 265
Flexible mobility on-demand: an environmental scan
Liyanage, S., Dia, H., Abduljabbar, R., & Bagloee, S. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11051262 · Cited by 111
The Potential Implications of Autonomous Vehicles in and around the Workplace
Pettigrew, S., Fritschi, L., & Norman, R. (2018) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph15091876 · Cited by 103
Metadata
- Authors
- Jittrapirom, P., Caiati, V., Feneri, A.-M., Ebrahimigharehbaghi, S., González, M. J. A., & Narayan, J.
- Venue
- Urban Planning
- Publisher
- Cogitatio
- Published
- 2017-06-29
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 13-25
- ISSN
- 2183-7635 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2732194751
- Cited by
- 850
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 47.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mobility as a Service: A Critical Review of Definitions, Assessments of Schemes, and Key Challenges. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.17645/up.v2i2.931
- The paper
- Jittrapirom, P., Caiati, V., Feneri, A.-M., Ebrahimigharehbaghi, S., González, M. J. A., & Narayan, J. (2017). Mobility as a Service: A Critical Review of Definitions, Assessments of Schemes, and Key Challenges. Urban Planning. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v2i2.931
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
