The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.
Critical thinking in practice: The priorities and practices of instructors teaching in higher education
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Although much research has addressed both potentially related constructs, such as intelligence and wisdom, and lists of potential component aspects of human thought, such as inductive or deductive reasoning (for reviews of all of these, see Sternberg and Funke 2019), reaching a consensus on a definition has been difficult, because CT relies on the coordination of many different skills (Bellaera et”
From Creativity, Critical Thinking, Communication, and Collaboration: Assessment, Certification, and Promotion of 21st Century Skills for the Future of Work and Education (2023) · cites this paper as Bellaera et al. 2021
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A revision of bloom's taxonomy: an overview
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002) · Theory Into Practice · doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2 · Cited by 8,132
DEWEY, J. M. (1910) · Cited by 6,801
Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook
Green, P. E., & Srinivasan, V. (1978) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/208721 · Cited by 3,165
Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts
Facione, P. A. (2011) · Cited by 2,252
Critical Thinking and Subject Specificity: Clarification and Needed Research
Ennis, R. H. (1989) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x018003004 · Cited by 1,024
Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Surkes, M. A., Tamim, R., & Zhang, D. (2008) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654308326084 · Cited by 977
An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21st century
Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M., & Stewart, I. (2014) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2013.12.004 · Cited by 960
Strategies for Teaching Students to Think Critically: A Meta-Analysis
Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Waddington, D. I., Wade, C. A., & Persson, T. (2015) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654314551063 · Cited by 932
Critical thinking in education: a review
Pithers, R. T., & Soden, R. (2000) · Educational Research · doi:10.1080/001318800440579 · Cited by 876
Critical Thinking: Why Is It so Hard to Teach?
Willingham, D. T. (2008) · Arts Education Policy Review · doi:10.3200/aepr.109.4.21-32 · Cited by 865
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Stedman, 2012, Identifying faculty’s knowledge of critical thinking concepts and perceptions of critical thinking instruction in higher education, NACTA Journal, 56, 9
- Tsui, 2002, Fostering critical thinking through effective pedagogy, The Journal of Higher Education, 73, 740
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Thornhill-Miller, B., Camarda, A., Mercier, M., Burkhardt, J.-M., Morisseau, T., Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., Vinchon, F., El Hayek, S., Augereau-Landais, M., Mourey, F., et al. (2023) · Journal of Intelligence · doi:10.3390/jintelligence11030054 · Cited by 768
Enhancing Students’ Critical Thinking Through Mathematics in Higher Education: A Systemic Review
Wang, Q., & Abdullah, A. H. (2024) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440241275651 · Cited by 89
Integration of Critical Thinking Skills in Science Learning Using Blended Learning System
Prafitasari, F., Sukarno, S., & Muzzazinah, M. (2021) · International Journal of Elementary Education · doi:10.23887/ijee.v5i3.35788 · Cited by 33
Maximizing Engagement with Cultural Heritage through Video Games
García, D. C., Reche, M. P. C., & Hernández, M. D. L. E. C. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15032350 · Cited by 52
Papaneophytou, C. P., & Nicolaou, S. A. (2025) · Trends in Higher Education · doi:10.3390/higheredu4020024 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Bellaera, L., Weinstein-Jones, Y., Ilie, S., & Baker, S. T.
- Affiliations
- University of Massachusetts Lowell (US)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Bellaera, Lauren
- Venue
- Thinking Skills and Creativity
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-09
- Volume
- 41
- Pages
- 100856
- ISSN
- 1871-1871 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3164160368
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2026: 37 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 38.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- Thinking Skills and Creativity (publishedVersion)
- Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Apollo
- Funders
- US-UK Fulbright Commission
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Education and Critical Thinking Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Keywords
- critical thinking, teaching practice, university instructors, critical thinking skills, humanities and social sciences education, research-practice gap, university teaching
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
