Cited by 17Education and Critical Thinking DevelopmentEducational Assessment and PedagogyEducator Training and Historical Pedagogy

Teachers' presentation of higher-order thinking questions and student engagement: Missing out on HOT opportunities

Resnick, Maya Shifra·2023·Thinking Skills and Creativity

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101412

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Resnick, M. S.
Affiliations
Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Corresponding author
Resnick, Maya Shifra
Venue
Thinking Skills and Creativity
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-12
Volume
50
Pages
101412
ISSN
1871-1871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4387910366
Cited by
17
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2
FWCI
7.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Thinking Skills and Creativity (publishedVersion)
Funders
ISF
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Critical Thinking Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy
Keywords
higher-order thinking skills, student engagement, teacher follow-up, history education, secondary education, teacher professional development, collaborative thinking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review