Cited by 62Urban Arborization and Environmental StudiesUrban Green Space and HealthForest Ecology and Conservation

Trends in Urban Forestry Research in Latin America & The Caribbean: A Systematic Literature Review and Synthesis

Open access
Barona, Camilo Ordóñez, Devisscher, Tahia, Dobbs, Cynnamon, Aguilar, Luis Orozco, Baptista, Mariana Dias, Navarro, Nuria Mónica, da Silva Filho, Demóstenes Ferreira, Escobedo, Francisco J.·2020·Urban Forestry & Urban Greening

Abstract

Research on urban forests has expanded in the last 30 years in the US, Canada, Europe, and Australia. Nonetheless, urban forestry has been explored to much less extent in the Latin America and the Caribbean region, despite being one of the most urbanized and biodiverse regions in the world. We address this gap by providing a baseline understanding of urban forest research in the region based on a systematic review of the academic literature. Of the 55,000 studies found, 195 were selected for review, and 182 were analysed and synthesized. These studies came from 13 countries and were published from 1970 to mid-2018 (inclusive) in English, Spanish, and Portuguese. Almost half of the studies were based in Brazil, followed by Mexico and Chile. To comparatively assess article output by country, we accounted for country population and Brazil, Chile, Nicaragua, and Puerto Rico had higher than average per capita article output. Most articles were ecological studies (64%) that used field surveys (58%) to research urban vegetation diversity. Most ecological studies did not include any social or management considerations. Only a few studies focused on spatiotemporal dynamics (12%) or the direct opinions of stakeholders (9%). We observed a notable increase in article output from the region during the last decade. The units of analysis targeted by these studies mostly focused on single trees in public areas (streets and parks). Understanding urban forests regionally could be strengthened by scaling up research across multiple units of analysis and across regional cities, which could provide a better understanding of regional spatiotemporal dynamics. To respond to current global trends and nurture regional strengths, research could also focus on a wider range of ecosystem services provided by urban forests, and the relationship of urban forests with poverty, crime, climate vulnerability, biodiversity loss, and social equity. These findings can inform key stakeholders in the region managing urban forests and trees about research trends and gaps to be filled. This article shows that the region indeed has an important body of research in urban forestry that should be recognized in global assessments. © 2019 Elsevier GmbH

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126544

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The most prominent societal challenge facing NbS is how to center justice and make inclusive planning for NbS a standard practice given limited participatory urban planning and governance.

    “The most prominent societal challenge facing NbS is how to center justice and make inclusive planning for NbS a standard practice given limited participatory urban planning and governance (23, 24, 26, 32, 44–53).”
  • To date, NbS research and practice continue to overlook critical technology and infrastructure relationships that may underpin effective NbS, thus driving implementation and management in a fragmented way.

    “To date, NbS research and practice continue to overlook critical technology and infrastructure relationships that may underpin effective NbS, thus driving implementation and management in a fragmented way (5, 23, 26, 45, 49, 75).”
  • A key gap in LAC is limited study of the equitable distribution of NbS benefits in communities and the relationship of NbS with community vulnerability and social equity.

    “A key gap in LAC is limited study of the equitable distribution of NbS benefits in communities and the relationship of NbS with community vulnerability and social equity (49).”
  • Since most NbS projects are isolated, it remains difficult to scale-up planning and adopt connectivity approaches at larger scales or in more densely populated areas, including in informal settlements.

    “Still, since most NbS projects are isolated, it remains difficult to scale-up planning and adopt connectivity approaches at larger scales or in more densely populated areas, including in informal settlements (27, 49).”
  • Ecological research on NbS often pays limited attention to social dynamics and issues of equity, justice, global power imbalances, and distribution of benefits across communities.

    “Similarly, ecological research on NbS often pays limited attention to social dynamics and issues of equity, justice, global power imbalances, and distribution of benefits across communities (5, 49, 53).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barona, C. O., Devisscher, T., Dobbs, C., Aguilar, L. O., Baptista, M. D., Navarro, N. M., da Silva Filho, D. F., & Escobedo, F. J.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Universidad Mayor (CL)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • RMIT University (AU)
  • Universidad del Rosario (CO)
Venue
Urban Forestry & Urban Greening
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
47
Pages
126544
ISSN
  • 1610-8167 (ISSN-L)
  • 1618-8667
OpenAlex
W2990466362
Cited by
62
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6
FWCI
0.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Urban forestry & urban greening (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Australian Research Council (LP160100780)
  • Medical Research Council Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Urban Arborization and Environmental Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Urban Green Space and Health
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Forest Ecology and Conservation
Keywords
Latin America and the Caribbean, research trends, ecosystem services, spatiotemporal dynamics, stakeholder engagement, urban trees, urban parks, research gaps, social equity, climate change vulnerability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review