Cited by 18Research on Leishmaniasis StudiesBrucella: diagnosis, epidemiology, treatmentVector-borne infectious diseases

Leishmania infantum in a Central Italy dog shelter: Retrospective study of serologic reactivity during a 4-year period in a confined dog population subjected to preventive and therapeutic treatment

Podaliri Vulpiani, Michele, Iannetti, Luigi, Di Mattia, Tiberio, Dalla Villa, Paolo·2009·Veterinary Parasitology

Abstract

Leishmaniasis from Leishmania infantum is a parasitary zoonotic disease and a serious problem to public health. Guidelines from Italian Health Authority (Istituto Superiore di Sanità) suggest to control the zoonotic visceral leishmaniasis canine reservoir in endemic areas using an association of preventive and therapeutic tools. Moreover, in literature there are no studies about the long term effects on the disease seroprevalence and incidence in relation to this "holistic" approach. Past research has considered the effects of the alternative employment of preventive or therapeutic treatment, usually for limited periods. In this retrospective study the patterns of seroprevalence and incidence of leishmaniasis in a dog shelter sited in an endemic area of Central Italy are described throughout a 4-year period. Both preventive spot-on tools (imidacloprid/permetrin) and therapeutic protocols based on antimonials and allopurinol were administered. The results showed a progressive reduction of prevalence and incidence of serological reactivity to L. infantum, corroborating the effectiveness of the treatment administered to the animals. Significant improvements from the beginning to the end of the 4-year period were reported, considering both prevalence and incidence. A very low rate of relapses (8% in a pool of 67 subjects positive since 2004; 10.2% among all subjects enrolled in the study) was achieved.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.11.014

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Podaliri Vulpiani, M., Iannetti, L., Di Mattia, T., & Dalla Villa, P.
Affiliations
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell'Abruzzo e del Molise G. Caporale (IT)
Corresponding author
Iannetti, Luigi
Venue
Veterinary Parasitology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-03
Volume
160
Issue
3-4
Pages
190-197
ISSN
0304-4017 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2052274478
Cited by
18
References
33
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Veterinary Parasitology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Research on Leishmaniasis Studies
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Brucella: diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Vector-borne infectious diseases
Keywords
Leishmania infantum, canine visceral leishmaniasis, seroprevalence, serological reactivity, dog shelters, antimonial drugs, allopurinol, relapse, long-term treatment outcomes, zoonoses
MeSH terms
Neonicotinoids, Allopurinol, Animals, Antibodies, Protozoan, Antiprotozoal Agents, Disease Reservoirs, Dog Diseases, Dogs, Female, Imidazoles, Italy, Leishmaniasis, Visceral, Male, Nitro Compounds, Retrospective Studies, Incidence, Seroepidemiologic Studies, Leishmania infantum, Endemic Diseases, Permethrin, Secondary Prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review