Cited by 36Research on Leishmaniasis StudiesTrypanosoma species research and implicationsBrucella: diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment

Canine leishmaniasis surveillance in a northern Italy kennel

Baldelli, R., Piva, S., Salvatore, D., Parigi, M., Melloni, O., Tamba, M., Bellini, R., Poglayen, G.·2011·Veterinary Parasitology

Abstract

An epidemiological survey on canine leishmaniasis (CanL) was performed during a 3-year period (2007-2009) in a public kennel of the Bologna province. The presence of the disease was shown in the canine population for the first time in 2007 by indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT). The parasite circulation was confirmed also by direct diagnostic tools, as PCR, cytology and cultural method, performed on different bioptic materials. The parasite was isolated and identified as Leishmania infantum zymodeme MON 1. The serological monitoring was performed also in 2008 and 2009 on animals that previously showed negative or uncertain results. The incidence values calculated by significant seroconversions in IFAT titre ≥ 1/160, ranged between 4.9% and 6.6%, indicating a stable focus of leishmaniasis. The entomological survey, performed by sticky and CO(2)-baited traps in 2008, showed the presence of the vector Phlebotomus perfiliewi. This study allowed us to identify a stable focus of CanL in an area that was not considered eco-compatible with the presence of the vector and infection. Our results confirm the northward spread of CanL towards areas not previously affected by autochthonous foci.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.01.052

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the province of Bologna (Emilia Romagna), L. infantum seroprevalence increased from 6.6% (16 out of 245 animals examined in 2007-2009) to 17.16% (217 out of 1264 tests in this study).

    “For example, in the province of Bologna (Emilia Romagna) the seroprevalence increased from 6.6% (i.e. 16 out of 245 animals examined in the period 2007–2009 [17]) up to 17.16% (i.e. 217 out of 1264 tests in this study).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baldelli, R., Piva, S., Salvatore, D., Parigi, M., Melloni, O., Tamba, M., Bellini, R., & Poglayen, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Bologna (IT)
  • Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia Romagna "Bruno Ubertini" (IT)
  • Centro Agricoltura Ambiente (Italy) (IT)
Corresponding author
Baldelli, R.
Venue
Veterinary Parasitology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-06
Volume
179
Issue
1-3
Pages
57-61
ISSN
0304-4017 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2006746932
Cited by
36
References
17
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Veterinary Parasitology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Research on Leishmaniasis Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Trypanosoma species research and implications
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Brucella: diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment
Keywords
canine leishmaniasis, kennel dogs, seroprevalence, seroconversion, Phlebotomus perfiliewi, sand fly vectors, insect monitoring, Bologna province
MeSH terms
Animals, Antibodies, Protozoan, Dog Diseases, Dogs, Italy, Leishmaniasis, Visceral, Psychodidae, Sentinel Surveillance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review