Cited by 20Parasitic Diseases Research and TreatmentDiptera species taxonomy and behaviorHelminth infection and control

Survey of Phortica drosophilid flies within and outside of a recently identified transmission area of the eye worm Thelazia callipaeda in Switzerland

Open access
Roggero, C., Schaffner, F., Bächli, G., Mathis, A., Schnyder, M.·2010·Veterinary Parasitology

Abstract

Phortica drosophilid flies are the intermediate hosts and vectors of the eye worm Thelazia callipaeda. This nematode originates from Asia and was first detected in southern Europe in 1989. The aim of the study was to assess the presence and the population dynamics of Phortica flies in a recently discovered new endemic area (Ticino, Southern Switzerland, south of the Alps) of T. callipaeda (site 1), at its border (site 2), at higher altitudes (beyond 1100 meters above sea level) within (site 3) or outside (site 4) the endemic area, and in a site north of the Alps (site 5). Flies were captured using two types of fruit-baited traps, the bait being changed once per week, and by netting around the eyes of a dog and human. A total of 1695 Phortica flies were collected. One of the fruit-baited traps, which can easily be assembled with cheap components, was found to be efficient for catching Phortica spp. At site 1, 644 such flies were collected with this trap during 34 weekly catches from April to October. The number of flies caught was highest at site 2 (n=903) and it was significantly lower (n=36) at site 5 north of the Alps. Virtually no Phortica at all were caught at higher altitudes (sites 3 and 4). Females were all in all predominant in the traps, accounting for 72.6% of Phortica flies (1150/1584), although males became dominant late in the season (male/female ratio 1.26 in October). In contrast, 80.2% of Phortica flies collected around the eyes of dog and human baits by netting (n=111) were males. No female at all was captured by netting until September. PCR for T. callipaeda was negative with all Phortica flies. Morphological examination of the 523 male flies based on features of the eye margin and the number of particular genital sensilla identified 89.1% P. semivirgo, 5.7% P. variegata but also 5.2% intermediate forms. Genetic analyses of partial mitochondrial cox1 and rDNA internal transcribed spacer 1 sequences revealed that these three morphotypes were genetically not distinguishable. This study confirms the presence of Phortica spp. north to the Alps and therefore the potential risk of T. callipaeda infection outside the currently known endemic region, depending on local abundance and longevity of the drosophilid vectors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.03.012

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Based on the GARP model, the number of reports of Thelazia callipaeda infestation may be expected to increase over the next years in areas where it is now considered non-endemic.

    “Based on this model, the number of reports of T. callipaeda infestation may be expected to increase over the next years in areas where it is now considered as non-endemic.”

    From Vector-borne helminths of dogs and humans in Europe (2013) · cites this paper as [65]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roggero, C., Schaffner, F., Bächli, G., Mathis, A., & Schnyder, M.
Affiliations
University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Schnyder, M.
Venue
Veterinary Parasitology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-07
Volume
171
Issue
1-2
Pages
58-67
ISSN
0304-4017 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1995142776
Cited by
20
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Veterinary Parasitology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
Universität Zürich
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Diptera species taxonomy and behavior
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
Keywords
Thelazia callipaeda, intermediate hosts, eye worm, Phortica variegata, sex ratio, altitudinal distribution, mitochondrial cox1
MeSH terms
Animals, Dog Diseases, Dogs, Female, Male, Seasons, Switzerland, Thelazioidea, Eye Infections, Parasitic, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Spirurida Infections, Drosophilidae, DNA, Helminth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review