Cited by 24Helminth infection and controlNematode management and characterization studiesParasites and Host Interactions

In vitro ovicidal activity of the nematophagous fungi Duddingtonia flagrans, Monacrosporium thaumasium and Pochonia chlamydosporia on Trichuris vulpis eggs

Silva, A.R., Araújo, J.V., Braga, F.R., Alves, C.D.F., Frassy, L.N.·2010·Veterinary Parasitology

Abstract

The in vitro effect of four isolates of the nematophagous fungi Duddingtonia flagrans (AC001), Monacrosporium thaumasium (NF34a) and Pochonia chlamydosporia (VC1 and VC4) on the eggs of Trichuris vulpis was evaluated. One thousand eggs of T. vulpis were plated on Petri dishes with 2% water-agar with the fungal isolates grown and without fungus as control. After 7, 14 and 21 days 100 eggs were removed from each plate and classified according to the following parameters: type 1, lytic effect without morphological damage to eggshell; type 2, lytic effect with morphological alteration of embryo and eggshell; and type 3, lytic effect with morphological alteration of embryo and eggshell, besides hyphal penetration and internal egg colonization. P. chlamydosporia demonstrated ovicidal activity (p<0.05) on the eggs of T. vulpis in the studied intervals presenting type 3 effect of 29.5% (VC1) and 36.5% (VC4), 59.5% (VC1) and 2.5% (VC4), 94.8% (VC1) and 2.95% (VC4) at 7, 14 and 21 days, respectively. The other fungi showed no type 3 effect. P. chlamydosporia should be a potential biological control agent of T. vulpis eggs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.04.034

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Silva, A. R., Araújo, J. V., Braga, F. R., Alves, C. D. F., & Frassy, L. N.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal de Viçosa (BR)
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (BR)
Venue
Veterinary Parasitology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-08
Volume
172
Issue
1-2
Pages
76-79
ISSN
0304-4017 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2146388928
Cited by
24
References
16
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Veterinary Parasitology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (publishedVersion)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Nematode management and characterization studies
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Parasites and Host Interactions
Keywords
ovicidal activity, nematophagous fungi, Duddingtonia flagrans, Monacrosporium thaumasium, Pochonia chlamydosporia, Trichuris vulpis, biological control, eggshell damage, hyphal penetration
MeSH terms
Animals, Ascomycota, Dog Diseases, Dogs, Pest Control, Biological, Trichuris

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review