Cited by 16Helminth infection and controlParasites and Host InteractionsParasitic Diseases Research and Treatment

Efficacy of Emodepside plus Praziquantel Tablets (Profender® Tablets for Dogs) against Mature and Immature Adult Trichuris vulpis Infections in Dogs

Schimmel, Annette, Altreuther, Gertraut, Schroeder, Iris, Charles, Samuel, Cruthers, Larry, Kok, Dawid J., Kraemer, Friederike, Krieger, Klemens J.·2009·Parasitology Research

Abstract

This paper reports on the efficacy of a novel flavoured tablet formulation of emodepside plus praziquantel (Profender tablets for dogs) against mature and immature adult whipworms (Trichuris vulpis) at the proposed minimum dose of 1 mg emodepside and 5 mg praziquantel per kg body weight in dogs. Three randomised, blinded and controlled laboratory studies with naturally or experimentally infected dogs were performed. The first study was conducted as a dose determination study in experimentally infected dogs using three different dose levels, i.e., 0.5x, 1x and 2x the minimum therapeutic dose. Two further studies confirmed the efficacy of emodepside plus praziquantel tablets against mature and immature adult T. vulpis at the recommended minimum dose. In all three studies, the efficacy against mature and immature adult T. vulpis was >99%. No side effects of the treatment were observed. It is concluded that the emodepside plus praziquantel tablet is an effective and safe treatment against mature and immature adult stages of T. vulpis in dogs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00436-009-1491-0

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Experimental and field studies have demonstrated nearly 100% efficacy of a new anthelmintic tablet formulation containing emodepside against immature and mature T. vulpis and other major canine intestinal nematodes and cestodes.

    “Experimental and field studies have demonstrated the nearly 100% efficacy of a new anthelmintic tablet formulation containing the cyclooctadepsipeptide emodepside against immature and mature T. vulpis and other major canine intestinal nematodes and cestodes [69,70].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schimmel, A., Altreuther, G., Schroeder, I., Charles, S., Cruthers, L., Kok, D. J., Kraemer, F., & Krieger, K. J.
Affiliations
  • Bayer (Germany) (DE)
  • Elanco Animal Health (Germany) (DE)
  • Clinvet (ZA)
  • University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation (DE)
Corresponding author
Altreuther, Gertraut
Venue
Parasitology Research
Published
2009-06-28
Volume
105
Issue
S1
Pages
17-22
ISSN
  • 0044-3255 (ISSN-L)
  • 0932-0113
  • 1432-1955
OpenAlex
W2014009324
Cited by
16
References
15
Citations by year
2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Parasitology Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Parasites and Host Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
Keywords
emodepside, praziquantel, Trichuris vulpis, trichuriasis, dogs, anthelmintic efficacy, dose determination, experimental infection, treatment safety
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Animals, Anthelmintics, Dog Diseases, Dogs, Double-Blind Method, Feces, Parasite Egg Count, Placebos, Praziquantel, Tablets, Trichuriasis, Trichuris, Treatment Outcome, Depsipeptides

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review