Cited by 14Parasitic Diseases Research and TreatmentHelminth infection and controlResearch on Leishmaniasis Studies

Efficacy of a single dose of a novel topical combination product containing eprinomectin to prevent heartworm infection in cats

Open access
Baker, Christine F., Tielemans, Eric, Pollmeier, Matthias G., McCall, John W., McCall, Scott D., Irwin, Jennifer, Chester, S. Theodore, Carithers, Doug S. +1 more·2014·Veterinary Parasitology

Abstract

Cats may be infected by heartworm, Dirofilaria immitis, through mosquito bites. They can develop severe heartworm disease when infective D. immitis larvae migrate and develop into adults in the pulmonary vasculature or other tissues. As there is no curative treatment for feline heartworm infection, the monthly administration of preventative treatment is recommended in endemic areas. Three controlled, blinded laboratory studies were conducted to evaluate the preventative efficacy of BROADLINE(®), a novel combination of fipronil, (S)-methoprene, eprinomectin, and praziquantel against D. immitis in cats. In each study, 28 cats were inoculated with approximately 100 (studies 1 and 2) or 40 (study 3) infective third stage D. immitis larvae by subcutaneous injection, thirty days prior to treatment. The larvae were from recent field isolates from naturally infected dogs from three distinct geographic areas (two in the USA and one in Europe). In each study, the cats were allocated randomly to two study groups of 14 cats each. The control group remained untreated. On Day 0, each cat in the treated group received one topical application of the novel topical formulation, delivering the minimum intended dose of 0.5mg of eprinomectin per kilogram of body weight. At 6 months after infection, all cats were humanely euthanized and examined for adult D. immitis. Across all three studies, 28 (68%) of the 41 untreated cats harbored one or more heartworms, while 100% of the 42 treated cats remained free of heartworm infection, demonstrating the 100% preventive efficacy of BROADLINE(®) against D. immitis in cats. The treatment was well tolerated and no health abnormality was observed in any treated cat.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.02.039

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baker, C. F., Tielemans, E., Pollmeier, M. G., McCall, J. W., McCall, S. D., Irwin, J., Chester, S. T., Carithers, D. S., & Rosentel, J. K.
Corresponding author
Baker, Christine F.
Venue
Veterinary Parasitology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-04
Volume
202
Issue
1-2
Pages
49-53
ISSN
0304-4017 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2082284507
Cited by
14
References
25
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Veterinary Parasitology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Research on Leishmaniasis Studies
Keywords
feline heartworm disease, Dirofilaria immitis, eprinomectin, fipronil, (S)-methoprene, praziquantel, heartworm prevention, cats, prophylaxis efficacy, larval infection
MeSH terms
Animals, Antiparasitic Agents, Cat Diseases, Cats, Dirofilaria immitis, Dirofilariasis, Drug Combinations, Female, Ivermectin, Male, Methoprene, Praziquantel, Pyrazoles, Random Allocation, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review