The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recovery of value-added products from cathode and anode material of spent lithium-ion batteries
Abstract
Herein we report a low cost and eco-friendly approach for the recovery of metals from cathode and anode materials of mobile phone spent lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). Li-based metal oxide and graphite were efficiently separated from their respective foils and used for lixiviation. Acetic acid (CH3COOH) and water were used as lixiviants for the recovery of metals from cathode and anode materials respectively. It was found that with 3 M Acetic acid and 7.5 vol% H2O2 as reducing agent 99.9% Li, 98.7% Co, and 99.5% Mn were leached out from cathode material in 40 min at 70 °C and a pulp density of 20 g/L. Besides the cathode leaching, Li was also extracted from anodic material graphite using water as a solvent and further recovered as solid Li2CO3 (99.7% Li). The kinetic evaluation of the cathode lixiviate process was studied using three different shrinking-core kinetic Models and established that the reaction follows the product layer diffusion controlled mechanism. From the cathode leach liquor, 99% Co was recovered as metal sulfide by controlled sulfide precipitation with 99.2% purity, and subsequently, MnCO3 and Li2CO3 were obtained with the purity of 98.7% and 99.4%, respectively. The purity of the salts revealed that these products recovered from spent LIBs might be utilized in the electrochemical energy-storage applications. In addition, this recycling process would promote the sustainable development of the battery industry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Meshram, P., Pandey, B. D., & Mankhand, T. R. (2014) · Hydrometallurgy · doi:10.1016/j.hydromet.2014.10.012 · Cited by 982
Cited by
Toward sustainable and systematic recycling of spent rechargeable batteries
Zhang, X., Li, L., Fan, E., Xue, Q., Bian, Y., Wu, F., & Chen, R. (2018) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00297e · Cited by 1,038
Progresses in Sustainable Recycling Technology of Spent Lithium‐Ion Batteries
Du, K., Ang, E. H., Wu, X., & Liu, Y. (2022) · ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL MATERIALS · doi:10.1002/eem2.12271 · Cited by 458
Technologies of lithium recycling from waste lithium ion batteries: a review
Bae, H., & Kim, Y. (2021) · Materials Advances · doi:10.1039/d1ma00216c · Cited by 428
A comprehensive review on the pretreatment process in lithium-ion battery recycling
Kim, S., Bang, J., Yoo, J., Shin, Y., Bae, J., Jeong, J., Kim, K., Dong, P., & Kwon, K. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126329 · Cited by 394
Meshram, P., Mishra, A., Abhilash, & Sahu, R. (2020) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125291 · Cited by 353
Metadata
- Authors
- Natarajan, S., Boricha, A. B., & Bajaj, H. C.
- Venue
- Waste Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-07
- Volume
- 77
- Pages
- 455-465
- ISSN
- 0956-053X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2800907486
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recovery of value-added products from cathode and anode material of spent lithium-ion batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.04.032
- The paper
- Natarajan, S., Boricha, A. B., & Bajaj, H. C. (2018). Recovery of value-added products from cathode and anode material of spent lithium-ion batteries. Waste Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.04.032
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.