The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Environmental impact of spent lithium ion batteries and green recycling perspectives by organic acids – A review
Abstract
The huge usage of rechargeable batteries in electronics has added to a recurrent problem worldwide in generating tonnage of spent lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). The inadequacy of the resources of the depleting critical metals has also been described in vogue. The environmental assessment of the life cycle of the LIBs has been elucidated vis-a-vis the effects of raw material supply, transportation, and recycling. Based on the available work for recycling technologies, this review also attempts to elicit the various methods practiced in discharging/dismantling, classification, and separation of components followed by metal recovery. The authors have reviewed the major developments in the area of recycling of cathode material by using various acids for extraction of metals from spent LIBs, compared the merits and demerits of acids used and presented a comprehensive outlook to the processes formulated vis-à-vis imperative need for using green techniques. The necessity for benign recycling methods is stressed upon to alleviate the need for high temperature and oxidative acid leaching conditions. The various green lixiviants (organic acids) attempted to extract metals from spent LIBs have been discussed in detail with respect to the mechanism, efficacies as well as the various factors (selectivity, cost, etc.) that govern the use of organic acids in battery recycling. It was ascertained that the GHG emissions to extract Co using organic acids stand 1/8 of that using an inorganic acid leaching process. Efforts need to be envisaged in separating the leached metals from these lixiviants ensuring economics and environmental benefits.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Handbook on the toxicology of metals
(1980) · Environmental Pollution Series A, Ecological and Biological · doi:10.1016/0143-1471(80)90008-2 · Cited by 2,832
Handbook on the Toxicology of Metals
(2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2011-0-07884-5 · Cited by 1,228
A Critical Review and Analysis on the Recycling of Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries
Lv, W., Wang, Z., Cao, H., Sun, Y., Zhang, Y., & Sun, Z. (2018) · ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03811 · Cited by 1,163
Toward sustainable and systematic recycling of spent rechargeable batteries
Zhang, X., Li, L., Fan, E., Xue, Q., Bian, Y., Wu, F., & Chen, R. (2018) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00297e · Cited by 1,038
Meshram, P., Pandey, B. D., & Mankhand, T. R. (2014) · Hydrometallurgy · doi:10.1016/j.hydromet.2014.10.012 · Cited by 982
Self-citationRecycling of lithium-ion batteries: Recent advances and perspectives
Huang, B., Pan, Z., Su, X., & An, L. (2018) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.07.116 · Cited by 945
Hydrometallurgical Processes for Recycling Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries: A Critical Review
Yao, Y., Zhu, M., Zhao, Z., Tong, B., Fan, Y., & Hua, Z. (2018) · ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b03545 · Cited by 898
Recycling of Spent Lithium-Ion Battery: A Critical Review
Zeng, X., Li, J., & Singh, N. (2014) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643389.2013.763578 · Cited by 897
Development of a recycling process for Li-ion batteries
Georgi-Maschler, T., Friedrich, B., Weyhe, R., Heegn, H., & Rutz, M. (2012) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.01.152 · Cited by 836
A review of processes and technologies for the recycling of lithium-ion secondary batteries
Xu, J., Thomas, H. R., Francis, R. W., Lum, K. R., Wang, J., & Liang, B. (2008) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.11.074 · Cited by 810
Cited by
Progresses in Sustainable Recycling Technology of Spent Lithium‐Ion Batteries
Du, K., Ang, E. H., Wu, X., & Liu, Y. (2022) · ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL MATERIALS · doi:10.1002/eem2.12271 · Cited by 458
Recycling of lithium iron phosphate batteries: Status, technologies, challenges, and prospects
Wang, M., Liu, K., Dutta, S., Alessi, D. S., Rinklebe, J., Ok, Y. S., & Tsang, D. C. W. (2022) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2022.112515 · Cited by 361
A review on the recycling of spent lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) by the bioleaching approach
Roy, J. J., Cao, B., & Madhavi, S. (2021) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130944 · Cited by 346
Life Cycle Assessment of Lithium-ion Batteries: A Critical Review
Arshad, F., Lin, J., Manurkar, N., Fan, E., Ahmad, A., Tariq, M.-U.-N., Wu, F., Chen, R., & Li, L. (2022) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106164 · Cited by 304
Challenges for sustainable lithium supply: A critical review
Alessia, A., Alessandro, B., Maria, V.-G., Carlos, V.-A., & Francesca, B. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126954 · Cited by 235
Metadata
- Authors
- Meshram, P., Mishra, A., Abhilash, & Sahu, R.
- Venue
- Chemosphere
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-03
- Volume
- 242
- Pages
- 125291
- ISSN
- 0045-6535 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2989414739
- Cited by
- 353
- References
- 82
- FWCI
- 17.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Environmental impact of spent lithium ion batteries and green recycling perspectives by organic acids – A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125291
- The paper
- Meshram, P., Mishra, A., Abhilash, & Sahu, R. (2020). Environmental impact of spent lithium ion batteries and green recycling perspectives by organic acids – A review. Chemosphere. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125291
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.