CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 41

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Spillover of different regulatory policies for waste sorting: Potential influence on energy-saving policy acceptability

Yang, Shu, Wei, Jiuchang, Cheng, Peng·2021·Waste Management
DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.02.008
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

An emerging body of research has contributed to understanding the spillover effect of pro-environmental behavior. However, most of the previous studies focused on the spillover effects of initial PEBs but neglected the spillover effects of different regulatory policies. This study conducts an experiment through survey questionnaire in Shanghai and Beijing to compare the spillover effects of two different kinds of waste sorting policy, i.e. voluntary participation policy and penalty policy. This study examines the spillover effects of these two policies on people's energy-saving policy acceptance. The examined energy-saving policy include price increase policy and subsidy policy. Results show that initial penalty policy targeted at waste sorting significantly decreases people's acceptability of price increase policy through negative spillover effect, while initial voluntary participation policy significantly increases people's acceptability of price increase policy through positive spillover effect. Nonetheless, no spillover effects are observed for subsidy policy acceptability. It indicates that penalty policy should not be used easily since there is a risk of resulting in negative spillover effects, while the voluntary participation policy should be better made use of in the future policy designment. The findings are meaningful for the local governments to better select and design their regulatory policies for waste sorting, while the Chinese government is going to promote t…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.02.008

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Agovino, 2019, European regional development fund and pro-environmental behavior. The case of Italian separate waste collection, Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci., 65, 36, 10.1016/j.seps.2018.02.001 · DOI
  2. Bem, 1972, Self-perception theory. Adv. Exp. Social. Psychol., 6, 1, 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60024-6 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Bolderdijk, 2013, Values determine the (In)effectiveness of informational interventions in promoting PEB, PLoS ONE, 8, 10.1371/journal.pone.0083911 · DOI
  4. Boomsma, 2014, The effect of information and values on acceptability of reduced street lighting, J. Environ. Psychol., 39, 22, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.11.004 · DOI
  5. Carlisle, 2019, Enhancing task performance through effective training: The mediating role of work environment and moderating effect of non-mandatory training, J. Bus. Res., 104, 340, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.033 · DOI
  6. Cheung, 2008, Testing mediation and suppression effects of latent variables: bootstrapping with structural equation models, Org. Res. Methods, 11, 296, 10.1177/1094428107300343 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Christensen, 2004, Social norms and identity relevance: a motivational approach to normative behavior, Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull., 30, 1295, 10.1177/0146167204264480 · DOI
  8. Cohen, 1992, A Power Primer, Psychol. Bull., 112, 155, 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Cornelissen, 2007, Whatever people say I am, that's what I am: social labeling as a social marketing tool, Int. J. Res. Mark., 24, 278e288, 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2007.05.001 · DOI
  10. Cornelissen, 2008, Positive cueing: promoting sustainable consumer behavior by cueing common environmental behaviors as environmental, Int. J. Res. Mark., 25, 46e55, 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2007.06.002 · DOI
  11. Dermody, 2015, Advancing sustainable consumption in the UK and China: the mediating effect of pro-environmental self-identity, J. Market. Manage., 31, 1472, 10.1080/0267257X.2015.1061039 · DOI
  12. Ek, 2018, Behavioral spillovers from food-waste collection in Swedish municipalities, J. Environ. Econ. Manage., 89, 168, 10.1016/j.jeem.2018.01.004 · DOI
  13. Evans, 2013, Selfinterest and pro-environmental behaviour, Nat. Clim. Change, 3, 122e125, 10.1038/nclimate1662 · DOI
  14. Watkins-Hayes, 2009, Race-ing the bootstrap climb: Black and Latino bureaucrats in post-reform welfare offices, Soc. Probl., 56, 285, 10.1525/sp.2009.56.2.285 · DOI
  15. Lacasse, 2015, The importance of being green: the influence of green behaviors on Americans’ political attitudes toward climate change, Environ. Behav., 47, 754e781, 10.1177/0013916513520491 · DOI
  16. Lanzini, 2014, Behavioral spillover in the environmental domain: an intervention study, J. Environ. Psychol., 40, 381, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.09.006 · DOI
  17. Lavee, 2007, Is municipal solid waste recycling economically efficient?, Environ. Manage., 40, 926, 10.1007/s00267-007-9000-7 · DOI
  18. Lavee, 2010, Benchmarking in municipal solid waste recycling, Waste Manage., 30, 2204, 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.03.032 · DOI
  19. Lavee, 2010, A proposal for alternative government policy to reduce landfill of household waste in Israel, Israel Econ. Rev., 8, 91
  20. Lavee, 2013, A cost evaluation method for transferring municipalities to solid waste source-separated system, Waste Manage., 33, 1064, 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.01.026 · DOI
  21. Maki, 2019, Meta-analysis of pro-environmental behavior spillover, Nat. Sustain., 2, 307, 10.1038/s41893-019-0263-9 · DOI
  22. Newton, 2015, Environmental concern and environmental purchase intentions: the mediating role of learning strategy, J. Business Res., 68, 1974, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.01.007 · DOI
  23. Peters, 2018, Beyond purchasing: electric vehicle adoption motivation and consistent sustainable energy behavior in the Netherlands, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 39, 234, 10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.008 · DOI
  24. Poortinga, 2013, The introduction of a single-use carrier bag charge in Wales: attitude change and behavioral spillover effects, J. Environ. Psychol., 36, 240, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.09.001 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Preacher, 2008, Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models, Behavior Res. Methods, 40, 879, 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Roth, 1998, Response rates in HRM/OB survey research: norms and correlates, 1990–1994, J. Manage. Stud., 24, 97
  27. Steinhorst, J., Klöckner, C. A., & Matthies, E., 2015. Saving electricity – For the money or the environment? Risks of limiting pro-environmental spillover when using monetary framing. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 125–135. · DOI
  28. Steinhorst, 2016, Monetary or environmental appeals for saving electricity? Potentials for spillover on low carbon policy acceptability, Energy Pol., 93, 335, 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.03.020 · DOI
  29. Stern, 2000, Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior, J. Soc. Issues, 56, 407, 10.1111/0022-4537.00175 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Stern, 1999, A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: the case of environmentalism, Hum. Ecol. Rev., 6, 81
  31. Stets, 2003, Bringing identity theory into environmental sociology, Sociol. Theory, 21, 398, 10.1046/j.1467-9558.2003.00196.x · DOI
  32. Thøgersen, 2009, Simple and painless? The limitations of spillover in environmental campaigning, J. Consum. Policy, 32, 141, 10.1007/s10603-009-9101-1 · DOI
  33. Thøgersen, 2012, Does green consumerism increase the acceptance of wind power?, Energy Policy, 51, 854, 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.09.044 · DOI
  34. Truelove, 2014, Positive and negative spillover of PEB: an integrative review and theoretical framework, Glob. Environ. Change, 29, 127, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.09.004 · DOI
  35. Truelove, 2016, From plastic bottle recycling to policy support: an experimental test of pro-environmental spillover, J. Environ. Psychol., 46, 55, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.03.004 · DOI
  36. Van der Werff, 2014, Fol-low the signal: When past pro-environmental actions signal who you are, J. Environ. Psychol., 40, 273, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.07.004 · DOI
  37. Walker, 2014, Community benefits, framing and the social acceptance of offshore wind farms: an experimental study in England, Energy Res. Social. Sci., 3, 46, 10.1016/j.erss.2014.07.003 · DOI
  38. Whitmarsh, 2010, Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse proenvironmental behaviors, J. Environ. Psychol., 30, 305, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.003 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Yang, 2016, Who exhibits more energy-saving behavior in direct and indirect ways in china? The role of psychological factors and socio-demographics, Energy Policy, 93, 196, 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.02.018 · DOI
  40. Zhou, 2019, New policy and implementation of municipal solid waste classification in Shanghai, China, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 16, 3099, 10.3390/ijerph16173099 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 41

Metadata

Authors
Yang, S., Wei, J., & Cheng, P.
Venue
Waste Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-04
Volume
125
Pages
112-121
ISSN
0956-053X
DOI
10.1016/j.wasman.2021.02.008
Cited by
41
References
5
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2024-12-15)
Licence
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (71904189)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review