Cited by 25Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchLandfill Environmental Impact StudiesEnvironmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies

Do PFAS changes in landfill leachate treatment systems correlate with changes in physical chemical parameters?

Zhang, Hekai, Chen, Yutao, Liu, Yalan, Bowden, John A., Townsend, Timothy G., Solo-Gabriele, Helena M.·2022·Waste Management

Abstract

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) have been found at relatively elevated concentrations in landfill leachates. Some landfill facilities treat physical-chemical parameters of their leachates using on-site leachate treatment systems before discharge. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether changes in physical-chemical parameters of leachate at on-site treatment systems (including bulk measurements, oxygen demanding components, and metals) were associated with concentration changes in PFAS. Leachates were evaluated at 15 on-site treatment facilities which included pond systems, aeration tanks, powdered activated carbon (PAC), sand filtration, reverse osmosis (RO) and combination treatment processes. Results show that most physical-chemical parameters and PFAS were significantly reduced in RO systems (over 90 %). For pond systems, statistically significant correlations (r s > 0.6, p 26 PFAS changes and the changes in pH, alkalinity, ammonia, and some metals. Significant correlations were also found between ∑ 8 PFAAs precursors changes and specific conductivity (SPC), pH, alkalinity, ammonia, and metals changes. For aeration tank systems, significant correlations (r s > 0.6, p 26 PFAS changes and changes in total dissolved solids and zinc, and between the changes of ∑ 8 PFAAs precursors and field pH. These correlations are believed to be associated with rainfall dilution and precipitation of calcium carbonate and other metals as leachate is introduced to the a…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.wasman.2022.07.030

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, H., Chen, Y., Liu, Y., Bowden, J. A., Townsend, T. G., & Solo-Gabriele, H. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Miami (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
Venue
Waste Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-09
Volume
151
Pages
49-59
ISSN
0956-053X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4289704532
Cited by
25
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 4
FWCI
1.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Waste Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Landfill Environmental Impact Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies
Keywords
per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, PFAS, landfill leachate, reverse osmosis, aeration tank, powdered activated carbon, sand filtration, pond systems, physicochemical parameters, rainfall dilution, calcium carbonate precipitation, metals, ammonia, pH, alkalinity, total dissolved solids
MeSH terms
Ammonia, Filtration, Fluorocarbons, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Waste Disposal Facilities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review