Cited by 82Urban Stormwater Management SolutionsWater Quality and Pollution AssessmentIntegrated Water Resources Management

Risk Prioritisation of Stormwater Pollutant Sources

Lundy, L., Ellis, J.B., Revitt, D.M.·2012·Water Research

Abstract

This paper describes the development of a pollutant risk prioritisation methodology for the comparative assessment of stormwater pollutants discharged from differing land use types and activities. Guidelines are presented which evaluate available data with respect to 'likelihood of occurrence' and 'severity of impact'. The use of the developed approach is demonstrated through its application to total suspended solids, biochemical oxygen demand, lead and cadmium. The proposed benchmarking scheme represents a transparent and auditable mechanism to support the synthesis of data from a variety of sources and is sufficiently flexible to incorporate the use of chemical, physical and/or ecological data sets. Practitioners involved in developing and implementing pollutant mitigation programmes are assisted in two key ways. Firstly through enabling the risks to receiving waters from diffuse pollution on a source-by-source and/or pollutant-by-pollutant basis at a catchment scale to be comparatively assessed and prioritised. Secondly, the methodology informs the selection of appropriate diffuse pollution control strategies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.watres.2011.10.039

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lundy, L., Ellis, J. B., & Revitt, D. M.
Affiliations
Middlesex University London (GB)
Corresponding author
Lundy, L.
Venue
Water Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-12
Volume
46
Issue
20
Pages
6589-6600
ISSN
0043-1354 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1995599738
Cited by
82
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3
FWCI
1.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Water Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Middlesex University Research Repository (Middlesex University Of London) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
University of Pittsburgh
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Quality and Pollution Assessment
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Integrated Water Resources Management
Keywords
stormwater pollution, non-point source pollution, land use, total suspended solids, biochemical oxygen demand, lead, cadmium, impact severity, benchmarking, catchment-scale assessment
MeSH terms
Cadmium, Conservation of Natural Resources, Drainage, Sanitary, Environmental Monitoring, Lead, Models, Theoretical, Oxygen, Rain, Water Microbiology, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review