The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The role of deep learning in urban water management: A critical review
Open accessAbstract
Deep learning techniques and algorithms are emerging as a disruptive technology with the potential to transform global economies, environments and societies. They have been applied to planning and management problems of urban water systems in general, however, there is lack of a systematic review of the current state of deep learning applications and an examination of potential directions where deep learning can contribute to solving urban water challenges. Here we provide such a review, covering water demand forecasting, leakage and contamination detection, sewer defect assessment, wastewater system state prediction, asset monitoring and urban flooding. We find that the application of deep learning techniques is still at an early stage as most studies used benchmark networks, synthetic data, laboratory or pilot systems to test the performance of deep learning methods with no practical adoption reported. Leakage detection is perhaps at the forefront of receiving practical implementation into day-to-day operation and management of urban water systems, compared with other problems reviewed. Five research challenges, i.e., data privacy, algorithmic development, explainability and trustworthiness, multi-agent systems and digital twins, are identified as key areas to advance the application and implementation of deep learning in urban water management. Future research and application of deep learning systems are expected to drive urban water systems towards high intelligence and autonomy. We hope this review will inspire research and development that can harness the power of deep learning to help achieve sustainable water management and digitalise the water sector across the world.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Federated learning: Challenges, methods, and future directions
Li, T., Sahu, A. K., Talwalkar, A., & Smith, V. (2020) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2020.2975749 · Cited by 6,210
Deep Learning in Remote Sensing: A Comprehensive Review and List of Resources
Zhu, X. X., Tuia, D., Mou, L., Xia, G.-S., Zhang, L., Xu, F., & Fraundorfer, F. (2017) · IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine · doi:10.1109/mgrs.2017.2762307 · Cited by 3,400
Explaining Deep Neural Networks and Beyond: A Review of Methods and Applications
Samek, W., Montavon, G., Lapuschkin, S., Anders, C. J., & Muller, K.-R. (2021) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2021.3060483 · Cited by 1,477 · cited 1×
“Compared to conventional machine learning algorithms, developing explainable deep learning has unique difficulties arising from (Samek et al., 2021): 1) multi-scale and distributed nature of network representations, 2) instability from the high depth of networks, 3) searching a reference data point…”
BackgroundGraph Neural Network-Based Anomaly Detection in Multivariate Time Series
Deng, A., & Hooi, B. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i5.16523 · Cited by 1,413
Battle of the Attack Detection Algorithms: Disclosing Cyber Attacks on Water Distribution Networks
Taormina, R., Galelli, S., Tippenhauer, N. O., Salomons, E., Ostfeld, A., Eliades, D. G., Aghashahi, M., Sundararajan, R., Pourahmadi, M., Banks, M. K., et al. (2018) · Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management · doi:10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0000969 · Cited by 277 · cited 4×
“…14 attack scenarios considering various components such as pumps, tanks and controllers in a benchmark water distribution system (i.e., C-Town), and results showed autoencoders substantially outperform traditional machine learning methods, i.e., XGBoost and LightGBM (Taormina and Galelli, 2018).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialA Review of Cybersecurity Incidents in the Water Sector
Hassanzadeh, A., Rasekh, A., Galelli, S., Aghashahi, M., Taormina, R., Ostfeld, A., & Banks, M. K. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)ee.1943-7870.0001686 · Cited by 195
ML for Flood Forecasting at Scale
Nevo, S., Anisimov, V., Elidan, G., El-Yaniv, R., Giencke, P., Gigi, Y., Hassidim, A., Moshe, Z., Schlesinger, M., Shalev, G., et al. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1901.09583 · Cited by 23
Cited by
Understanding of Convolutional Neural Network (CNN): A Review
Purwono, P., Ma'arif, A., Rahmaniar, W., Fathurrahman, H. I. K., Frisky, A. Z. K., & Haq, Q. M. U. (2023) · International Journal of Robotics and Control Systems · doi:10.31763/ijrcs.v2i4.888 · Cited by 319
Artificial Intelligence as a Disruptive Technology—A Systematic Literature Review
Păvăloaia, V.-D., & Necula, S.-C. (2023) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics12051102 · Cited by 290
Metadata
- Authors
- Fu, G., Jin, Y., Sun, S., Yuan, Z., & Butler, D.
- Venue
- Water Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-09
- Volume
- 223
- Pages
- 118973
- ISSN
- 0043-1354 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4293180257
- Cited by
- 433
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 37.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The role of deep learning in urban water management: A critical review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.watres.2022.118973
- The paper
- Fu, G., Jin, Y., Sun, S., Yuan, Z., & Butler, D. (2022). The role of deep learning in urban water management: A critical review. Water Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2022.118973
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.