The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Abstract
Salbutamol, a short-acting beta-agonist, is a bronchodilator that works by reversing airway smooth muscle bronchoconstriction. The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) guidelines allow athletes a maximum of 1600 μg inhaled salbutamol; however, there have been no conclusive studies evaluating how this dose affects exercise performance. The current study investigated the use of 1600 μg inhaled salbutamol and its effect on endurance running performance. Using a randomized double-blind design, 7 experienced male runners with no history of asthma inhaled either placebo, salbutamol 800 μg, or salbutamol 1600 μg 15 minutes before a 5-km time trial in either temperate (18ºC) or hot (30ºC) environments. Measured outcomes for each trial included overall time, heart rate, oxygen consumption, carbon dioxide production, minute ventilation, rate of perceived exertion, serum lactate, and urinary salbutamol concentration. The investigators found no difference between placebo, salbutamol 800 μg, or salbutamol 1600 μg in either temperate or hot environments for overall time and all other outcome measures. Additionally, no adverse effects were detected with the use of salbutamol. Study limitations include sample size, variability of amount inhaled through pocket chamber, and body habitus variability. The authors conclude that current WADA guidelines are sufficient to avoid pharmaceutical performance enhancement. (J Sports Sci Med. 2014;13:271–279). J Dickinson, J Hu, N Chester, et al.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review
Sigrist, R., Rauter, G., Riener, R., & Wolf, P. (2013) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0333-8 · Cited by 1,416
Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2016) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-015-0999-9 · Cited by 1,238
Music in the exercise domain: a review and synthesis (Part I)
Karageorghis, C. I., & Priest, D.-L. (2012) · International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1080/1750984x.2011.631026 · Cited by 546
Energy availability in athletes
Loucks, A. B., Kiens, B., & Wright, H. H. (2011) · Journal of Sports Sciences · doi:10.1080/02640414.2011.588958 · Cited by 513
The specificity of training prescription and physiological assessment: A review
Reilly, T., Morris, T., & Whyte, G. (2009) · Journal of Sports Sciences · doi:10.1080/02640410902729741 · Cited by 283
Metadata
- Authors
- Stewart, M.
- Venue
- Wilderness & Environmental Medicine
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-09
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 352-353
- ISSN
- 1080-6032 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-1534
- OpenAlex
- W4235478466
- Cited by
- 1,227
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 405.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Journal of Sports Science and Medicine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.wem.2014.06.007
- The paper
- Stewart, M. (2014). Journal of Sports Science and Medicine. Wilderness & Environmental Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wem.2014.06.007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.