Cited by 15Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

Women's responses to two models of antepartum high-risk care: Day stay and hospital stay

Stainton, M. Colleen, Lohan, Maria, Fethney, Judith, Woodhart, Lyn, Islam, Shamim·2006·Women and Birth

Abstract

Aim To replicate and extend previous research by examining women's responses to two current models of high-risk antenatal care that replaced the traditional bed rest model.Participants A sample of 61 women assigned to high-risk antenatal care: 29 in the Antenatal Hospital Unit (ANHU) and 32 in the Pregnancy Day Stay Unit (PDSU).Methods A longitudinal study with data collected by a range of validated tools were used to assess mood, family functioning, stress and physical symptoms every 2 weeks from admission into antenatal high-risk care to birthing and at 3- and 6-weeks postpartum. Data were analysed for similarities and differences and change over time between the two groups of women.Findings Stress from emotions was the highest antenatal stressor for both groups and highest for those in hospital. Stress about health increased over time for those in the PDSU and varied for those in ANHU. Anxiety was significantly different between the groups over time (p<0.01), being highest for the ANHU group and decreasing from admission to 6-weeks postnatal for both groups. Sensation Seeking (sensory deprivation) showed significant differences (p<0.05) with the highest scores in the ANHU group and increasing over time for both groups. Family relationships were most disrupted for those in ANHU. Both groups were satisfied with support from spouse, family and friends and those in ANHU acknowledged the support received from midwifery staff.Conclusions and implications The responses of both the woman and her family differ between the two models of care and vary with time. Midwives can use the patterns of response identified of these findings to address needs for assistance with family relationships, sensory stimulation, information and support and management of anxiety when care is required for complications of pregnancy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.wombi.2006.08.001

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 21 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stainton, M. C., Lohan, M., Fethney, J., Woodhart, L., & Islam, S.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Royal Hospital for Women (AU)
Corresponding author
Stainton, M. Colleen
Venue
Women and Birth
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-12
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
89-95
ISSN
1871-5192 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2056314111
Cited by
15
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Women and Birth (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
bed rest, prenatal anxiety, sensory deprivation, family functioning, family relationships, social support, midwife support, postpartum mood, prenatal stress, pregnancy complications
MeSH terms
Adult, Delivery Rooms, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Mothers, New South Wales, Organizational Innovation, Pilot Projects, Pregnancy, Prenatal Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Psychological, Program Evaluation, Birthing Centers, Patient Satisfaction, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Pregnancy, High-Risk

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review