Cited by 135Preterm Birth and ChorioamnionitisInfant Development and Preterm CareMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

Antepartum Bed Rest for Pregnancy Complications: Efficacy and Safety for Preventing Preterm Birth

Maloni, Judith A.·2010·Biological Research For Nursing

Abstract

Preterm birth is the major maternal-child health issue across developed nations and the leading cause of perinatal mortality and morbidity. Of all deaths of infants <1 year of age in the United States in 2005, 68.6% occurred in infants born prior to term. Although the preterm birth rate in European countries is 5-7%, the U.S. preterm birth rate is 12.7%, representing an increase of 9% since 2000. Antepartum bed rest/activity restriction (ABR/AR) has been a mainstay of treatment to prevent preterm birth for the past 30 years prescribed for nearly 1 million women in the United States annually, despite a lack of evidence for its effectiveness. In fact, there is increasing evidence that ABR causes several adverse physiologic and psychological side effects among women and their infants. Unfortunately, these findings have had little impact on clinical practice. This integrative review of literature provides a comprehensive analysis of the evidence for the practice of prescribing ABR and its physiologic, behavioral, and experiential side effects. It also presents a model to guide continuing research about the effects of maternal bed rest as well as evidence supporting the use of home care with bed rest, a different, safe, and feasible model of prenatal care for treating women with pregnancy complications used particularly in other countries. Finally, suggestions to improve the health of high-risk pregnant and postpartum women and their infants are provided.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1099800410375978

Cites

134 of 134 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is no evidence to support the use of activity restriction during pregnancy at home or in hospital.

    “There is no evidence to support the use of activity restriction during pregnancy at home or in hospital, and practitioners should not assume efficacy for bed-rest treatment until evidence is produced [9,10,18,19].”

    From Lack of evidence for prescription of antepartum bed rest (2011) · cites this paper as [10]

  • The assumption that antepartum bed-rest treatment is safe for mothers and their fetuses/infants has no data providing evidence to support it.

    “The second assumption behind antepartum bed-rest treatment, that it is safe for mothers and their fetuses/infants, has no data providing evidence to support it [10].”

    From Lack of evidence for prescription of antepartum bed rest (2011) · cites this paper as [10]

  • Studies of women treated with pregnancy bed-rest identify psychosocial problems as a side effect.

    “Studies of women treated with pregnancy bed-rest identify numerous side effects, including muscle atrophy, bone loss, weight loss, decreased infant birthweight in singleton gestations and gestational age at birth, and psychosocial problems.”

    From Lack of evidence for prescription of antepartum bed rest (2011) · cites this paper as [10]

  • Studies of women treated with pregnancy bed-rest identify weight loss as a side effect.

    “Studies of women treated with pregnancy bed-rest identify numerous side effects, including muscle atrophy, bone loss, weight loss, decreased infant birthweight in singleton gestations and gestational age at birth, and psychosocial problems.”

    From Lack of evidence for prescription of antepartum bed rest (2011) · cites this paper as [10]

  • Studies of women treated with pregnancy bed-rest identify bone loss as a side effect.

    “Studies of women treated with pregnancy bed-rest identify numerous side effects, including muscle atrophy, bone loss, weight loss, decreased infant birthweight in singleton gestations and gestational age at birth, and psychosocial problems.”

    From Lack of evidence for prescription of antepartum bed rest (2011) · cites this paper as [10]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maloni, J. A.
Affiliations
Case Western Reserve University (US)
Corresponding author
Maloni, Judith A.
Venue
Biological Research For Nursing
Published
2010-08-26
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
106-124
ISSN
  • 1099-8004 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4175
OpenAlex
W2032618589
Cited by
135
References
133
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 60 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 6
FWCI
0.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Research For Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Public Health Service (R01 NRO3323)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Keywords
activity limitation, preterm birth prevention, pregnancy complications, psychological impact, home care, high-risk pregnancy, postpartum women, perinatal mortality
MeSH terms
Bed Rest, Female, Humans, Obstetric Labor, Premature, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review