Cited by 197Infant Development and Preterm CareInfant Health and DevelopmentMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum

Bonding in neonatal intensive care units: Experiences of extremely preterm infants’ mothers

Open access
Fernández Medina, Isabel María, Granero-Molina, José, Fernández-Sola, Cayetano, Hernández-Padilla, José Manuel, Camacho Ávila, Marcos, López Rodríguez, María del Mar·2018·Women and Birth

Abstract

BACKGROUND The birth of an extremely preterm infant can disrupt normal mother-infant physical contact and the care provided by the mother. This situation has an impact on the process of bonding between the mother and the child. AIM The objective of this study was to describe and understand the experiences of mothers who have extremely preterm infants admitted in Neonatal Intensive Care Units with regard to their bonding process. METHODS An interpretive, qualitative research methodology using Gadamer's philosophical hermeneutics was carried out. A focus group and eleven in-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted. Data were collected between June and September of 2016. FINDINGS Sixteen women with a mean age of 34.4 years participated in the study. Two themes emerged from the data analysis: (1) premature labour and technological environment, a distorted motherhood, with the subthemes 'feeling of emptiness and emotional crisis' and 'the complexity of the environment and care generate an emotional swing'; (2) learning to be the mother of an extremely preterm infant, with the subthemes "the difficulty of relating to a stranger" and 'forming the bond in spite of difficulties'. CONCLUSIONS The bonding with extremely preterm infants is interrupted after giving birth. The maternal emotional state and the environment of the neonatal intensive care unit limit its development. Nursing care can facilitate mother-infant bonding by encouraging communication, participation in care, massaging or breastfeeding.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.wombi.2017.11.008

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Bowlby, 1969, vol. 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fernández Medina, I. M., Granero-Molina, J., Fernández-Sola, C., Hernández-Padilla, J. M., Camacho Ávila, M., & López Rodríguez, M. D. M.
Venue
Women and Birth
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-08
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
325-330
ISSN
1871-5192 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2768870513
Cited by
192
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 2
FWCI
11.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Women and Birth (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Middlesex University Research Repository (Middlesex University Of London) (acceptedVersion)
  • RISalud Institutional Health Repository of Andalucía (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Infant Health and Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Keywords
mother-infant bonding, extremely preterm infants, neonatal intensive care unit, maternal experience, premature labour, technological environment, maternal emotional state, nursing care, breastfeeding, skin-to-skin contact
MeSH terms
Adult, Breast Feeding, Emotions, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Premature, Intensive Care Units, Neonatal, Interviews as Topic, Male, Mother-Child Relations, Mothers, Object Attachment, Pregnancy, Focus Groups, Qualitative Research, Infant, Extremely Premature

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review