The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How can market mechanisms for forest environmental services help the poor? Preliminary lessons from Latin America
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Exploring the forest--poverty link: key concepts, issues and research implications
A., A., & S., W. (2003) · doi:10.17528/cifor/001211 · Cited by 554
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Asquith, 2002, Can forest-protection carbon projects improve rural livelihoods? Analysis of the Noel Kempff Mercado Climate Action Project, Bolivia, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 7, 323, 10.1023/A:1024712424319 · DOI
- Ferraro, 2002, Direct payments to conserve biodiversity, Science, 298, 1718, 10.1126/science.1078104 · DOI · Paper page
- Ferraro, 2002, The cost-effectiveness of conservation payments, Land Economics, 78, 339, 10.2307/3146894 · DOI · Paper page
- Hardner, 2002, Rethinking green consumerism, Scientific American, 286, 88, 10.1038/scientificamerican0502-88 · DOI
- Landell-Mills, N., & Porras, I. (2002). Silver bullet or fool’s gold? A global review of markets for forest environmental services and their impacts on the poor. Instruments for sustainable private sector forestry series. International Institute for Environment and Development, London.
- Mañez Costa, M., & Zeller, M. (2003). Peasants’ production systems and the integration of incentives for watershed protection. A case study of Guatemala. Paper presented at the CIFOR-BMZ Conference on Forests, Livelihoods, and Biodiversity, Bonn, Germany; May 2003.
- Mera-Orcés, V. (2001). Caracterización social de los páramos. In V. Mena, G. Medina, & M. Hofstede (Eds.), Los Páramos del Ecuador. Particularidades, problemas y perspectivas. Abya Yala/Proyecto Páramo, Quito.
- Pagiola, S., Arcenas, A., & Platais, G. (forthcoming). Can payments for environmental services help reduce poverty? An exploration of the issues and the evidence to date. World Development. · DOI · Paper page
- Rojas, M., & Aylward, B. (2003). What are we learning from experiences with markets for environmental services in Costa Rica? A review and critique of the literature. Markets for Environmental Services No. 2, International Institute for Environment and Development, London.
Cited by
Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: An overview of the issues
Engel, S., Pagiola, S., & Wunder, S. (2008) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.011 · Cited by 2,466
Self-citationThe roles of livestock in developing countries
Herrero, M., Grace, D., Njuki, J., Johnson, N., Enahoro, D., Silvestri, S., & Rufino, M. C. (2013) · Animal · doi:10.1017/s1751731112001954 · Cited by 659
McDermott, M., Mahanty, S., & Schreckenberg, K. (2013) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2012.10.006 · Cited by 645
Poverty, development, and environment
BARBIER, E. B. (2010) · Environment and Development Economics · doi:10.1017/s1355770x1000032x · Cited by 373
The Equity and Legitimacy of Markets for Ecosystem Services
Corbera, E., Brown, K., & Adger, W. N. (2007) · Development and Change · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.2007.00425.x · Cited by 373
Metadata
- Authors
- Grieg-Gran, M., Porras, I., & Wunder, S.
- Venue
- World Development
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-09
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1511-1527
- ISSN
- 0305-750X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2082479717
- Cited by
- 475
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How can market mechanisms for forest environmental services help the poor? Preliminary lessons from Latin America. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.05.002
- The paper
- Grieg-Gran, M., Porras, I., & Wunder, S. (2005). How can market mechanisms for forest environmental services help the poor? Preliminary lessons from Latin America. World Development. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.05.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
