Cited by 75Drug Solubulity and Delivery SystemsPharmaceutical studies and practicesPharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Food Effect Projections via Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling: Predictive Case Studies

Open access

Abstract

Food can alter the absorption of orally administered drugs. Biopharmaceutics physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling offers the possibility to simulate a compound's pharmacokinetics under fasted or fed states. To advance the utility of PBPK modeling, with a view to regulatory impact, we have pooled our experience across 4 pharmaceutical companies to propose a general multistep PBPK workflow leveraging pre-existing clinical data for immediate-release formulations of Biopharmaceutics Classification System I and II compounds. With this strategy, we wish to promote pragmatic PBPK approaches for compounds where absorption is well understood, that is, compounds with moderate-to-high permeability that are not substrates for uptake transporters. Five case studies demonstrate how food effect can be well predicted using appropriately established and validated models. The case studies integrate solubility and dissolution data for initial model development and apply a "middle-out" validation with clinical data in one prandial state. Then, whenever possible, a validation against both fasted and fed state data is recommended before application of the models prospectively for to-be-marketed formulations. Thus, when combined with limited clinical data, PBPK models could be used to simulate outcomes for new doses, formulations, or active pharmaceutical ingredient forms, in lieu of a clinical food-effect study.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.xphs.2018.05.024

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Custodio, 2008, Predicting drug disposition, absorption/elimination/transporter interplay and the role of food on drug absorption, Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 60, 717, 10.1016/j.addr.2007.08.043 · DOI
  2. Fleisher, 1999, Drug, meal and formulation interactions influencing drug absorption after oral administration. Clinical implications, Clin Pharmacokinet, 36, 233, 10.2165/00003088-199936030-00004 · DOI
  3. Wu, 2005, Predicting drug disposition via application of BCS: transport/absorption/elimination interplay and development of a biopharmaceutics drug disposition classification system, Pharm Res, 22, 11, 10.1007/s11095-004-9004-4 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Benet, 2011, BDDCS applied to over 900 drugs, AAPS J, 13, 519, 10.1208/s12248-011-9290-9 · DOI
  5. Xia, 2013, Utility of physiologically based modeling and preclinical in vitro/in vivo data to mitigate positive food effect in a BCS class 2 compound, AAPS PharmSciTech, 14, 1255, 10.1208/s12249-013-0018-2 · DOI
  6. Dressman, 2000, In vitro-in vivo correlations for lipophilic, poorly water-soluble drugs, Eur J Pharm Sci, 11, S73, 10.1016/S0928-0987(00)00181-0 · DOI
  7. Lentz, 2007, Development and validation of a preclinical food effect model, J Pharm Sci, 96, 459, 10.1002/jps.20767 · DOI
  8. Li, 2018, Predictive performance of physiologically based pharmacokinetic models for the effect of food on oral drug absorption: current status, CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol, 7, 82, 10.1002/psp4.12260 · DOI
  9. Dawson, 1982, The pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of mebendazole in man: a pilot study using [3H]-mebendazole, Br J Clin Pharmacol, 14, 453, 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1982.tb02008.x · DOI
  10. Dawson, 1985, The pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of a tracer dose of [3H]-mebendazole in man, Br J Clin Pharmacol, 19, 79, 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1985.tb02616.x · DOI
  11. Dressman, 1990, Upper gastrointestinal (GI) pH in young, healthy men and women, Pharm Res, 7, 756, 10.1023/A:1015827908309 · DOI
  12. Mann, 2017, Validation of dissolution testing with biorelevant media: an OrBiTo study, Mol Pharm, 14, 4192, 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.7b00198 · DOI
  13. Takano, 2006, Oral absorption of poorly water-soluble drugs: computer simulation of fraction absorbed in humans from a miniscale dissolution test, Pharm Res, 23, 1144, 10.1007/s11095-006-0162-4 · DOI
  14. Parrott, 2013, Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling to predict single and multiple dose human pharmacokinetics of bitopertin, Clin Pharmacokinet, 52, 673, 10.1007/s40262-013-0061-x · DOI
  15. Parrott, 2014, Physiologically based absorption modelling to predict the impact of drug properties on pharmacokinetics of bitopertin, AAPS J, 16, 1077, 10.1208/s12248-014-9639-y · DOI
  16. Jones, 2011, PhRMA CPCDC initiative on predictive models of human pharmacokinetics, part 2: comparative assessment of prediction methods of human volume of distribution, J Pharm Sci, 100, 4074, 10.1002/jps.22553 · DOI
  17. Sutton, 2017, The impact of gastric pH, volume, and emptying on the food effect of ziprasidone oral absorption, AAPS J, 19, 1084, 10.1208/s12248-017-0065-9 · DOI
  18. Sutton, 2009, Role of physiological intestinal water in oral absorption, AAPS J, 11, 277, 10.1208/s12248-009-9087-2 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Riethorst, 2016, Characterization of human duodenal fluids in fasted and fed state conditions, J Pharm Sci, 105, 673, 10.1002/jps.24603 · DOI
  20. Samant TS, Dhuria S, Lu Y, et al. Ribociclib bioavailability is not affected by gastric pH changes or food intake: in silico and clinical evaluations. Clin Pharmacol Ther. [E-pub ahead of print] 2017. · DOI
  21. Murphy, 2015, The role of CDK4/6 inhibition in breast cancer, Oncologist, 20, 483, 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0443 · DOI
  22. Einolf, 2017, Physiologically based pharmacokinetic model predictions of Panobinostat (LBH589) as a victim and perpetrator of drug-drug interactions, Drug Metab Dispos, 45, 1304, 10.1124/dmd.117.076851 · DOI
  23. Wagner, 2015, Predicting the effect of cytochrome P450 inhibitors on substrate drugs: analysis of physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling submissions to the US Food and Drug Administration, Clin Pharmacokinet, 54, 117, 10.1007/s40262-014-0188-4 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Wagner, 2015, Application of physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling to support dose selection: report of an FDA public workshop on PBPK, CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol, 4, 226, 10.1002/psp4.33 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Jones, 2013, Basic concepts in physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling in drug discovery and development, CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol, 2, 1, 10.1038/psp.2013.41 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Sugano, 2010, Prediction of food effect by bile micelles on oral drug absorption considering free fraction in intestinal fluid, Eur J Pharm Sci, 40, 118, 10.1016/j.ejps.2010.03.011 · DOI
  27. Kawai, 2011, Profiling and trend analysis of food effects on oral drug absorption considering micelle interaction and solubilization by bile micelles, Drug Metab Pharmacokinet, 26, 180, 10.2133/dmpk.DMPK-10-RG-098 · DOI
  28. Hens, 2015, Gastrointestinal behavior of nano- and microsized fenofibrate: in vivo evaluation in man and in vitro simulation by assessment of the permeation potential, Eur J Pharm Sci, 77, 40, 10.1016/j.ejps.2015.05.023 · DOI
  29. Rose, 2017, Incorporation of the time-varying postprandial increase in splanchnic blood flow into a PBPK model to predict the effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of orally administered high-extraction drugs, AAPS J, 19, 1205, 10.1208/s12248-017-0099-z · DOI
  30. Augustijns, 2014, A review of drug solubility in human intestinal fluids: implications for the prediction of oral absorption, Eur J Pharm Sci, 57, 322, 10.1016/j.ejps.2013.08.027 · DOI
  31. Dahlgren, 2015, Direct in vivo human intestinal permeability (Peff) determined with different clinical perfusion and intubation methods, J Pharm Sci, 104, 2702, 10.1002/jps.24258 · DOI
  32. Kostewicz, 2014, PBPK models for the prediction of in vivo performance of oral dosage forms, Eur J Pharm Sci, 57, 300, 10.1016/j.ejps.2013.09.008 · DOI
  33. Carlert, 2010, Predicting intestinal precipitation–a case example for a basic BCS class II drug, Pharm Res, 27, 2119, 10.1007/s11095-010-0213-8 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Tistaert, C., Heimbach, T., Xia, B., Parrott, N., Samant, T. S., & Kesisoglou, F.
Affiliations
  • Janssen (Belgium) (BE)
  • Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research (CH)
  • Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) (US)
  • F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG (CH)
Corresponding author
Kesisoglou, Filippos
Venue
Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-01
Volume
108
Issue
1
Pages
592-602
ISSN
0022-3549 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2808428985
Cited by
75
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 6
FWCI
4.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
Keywords
food effect, physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling, fed versus fasted state, oral drug absorption, Biopharmaceutics Classification System, immediate-release formulation
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Biopharmaceutics, Chemistry, Pharmaceutical, Computer Simulation, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Fasting, Food, Humans, Intestinal Absorption, Models, Biological, Permeability, Solubility, Food-Drug Interactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review