Cited by 35Developmental Biology and Gene RegulationPluripotent Stem Cells ResearchPlanarian Biology and Electrostimulation

A conserved mechanism for vertebrate mesoderm specification in urodele amphibians and mammals

Open access
Swiers, Gemma, Chen, Yi-Hsien, Johnson, Andrew D., Loose, Matthew·2010·Developmental Biology

Abstract

Understanding how mesoderm is specified during development is a fundamental issue in biology, and it has been studied intensively in embryos from Xenopus. The gene regulatory network (GRN) for Xenopus is surprisingly complex and is not conserved in vertebrates, including mammals, which have single copies of the key genes Nodal and Mix. Why the Xenopus GRN should express multiple copies of Nodal and Mix genes is not known. To understand how these expanded gene families evolved, we investigated mesoderm specification in embryos from axolotls, representing urodele amphibians, since urodele embryology is basal to amphibians and was conserved during the evolution of amniotes, including mammals. We show that single copies of Nodal and Mix are required for mesoderm specification in axolotl embryos, suggesting the ancestral vertebrate state. Furthermore, we uncovered a novel genetic interaction in which Mix induces Brachyury expression, standing in contrast to the relationship of these molecules in Xenopus. However, we demonstrate that this functional relationship is conserved in mammals by showing that it is involved in the production of mesoderm from mouse embryonic stem cells. From our results, we produced an ancestral mesoderm (m)GRN, which we suggest is conserved in vertebrates. The results are discussed within the context of a theory in which the evolution of mechanisms governing early somatic development is constrained by the ancestral germ line-soma relationship, in which germ cells are produced by epigenesis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ydbio.2010.04.002

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A fundamental Box II subcircuit may underlie mesoderm specification in vertebrate embryogenesis.

    “Similarly, a fundamental Box II subcircuit may underlie mesoderm specification in vertebrate embryogenesis (Swiers et al., 2010).”

    From Evolution of Gene Regulatory Networks Controlling Body Plan Development (2011) · cites this paper as Swiers et al., 2010

    The Abstract and Discussion propose a mesoderm gene-regulatory network conserved across vertebrates, supporting the hedged claim that a fundamental circuit may underlie mesoderm specification. Our copy does not identify that network as a “Box II subcircuit,” so it does not establish the claim’s specific designation. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Turksne, K. (Ed.), 2006. Embryonic Stem Cell Protocols Volume 2: Differentiation Models. Humana Press, Totowa.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Swiers, G., Chen, Y.-H., Johnson, A. D., & Loose, M.
Affiliations
University of Nottingham (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Johnson, Andrew D.
  • Loose, Matthew
Venue
Developmental Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-07
Volume
343
Issue
1-2
Pages
138-152
ISSN
0012-1606 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2019140473
Cited by
35
References
58
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • MRC
  • The Wellcome Trust
  • EvoCell Ltd
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Planarian Biology and Electrostimulation
Keywords
mesoderm specification, Nodal signaling, Brachyury, gene regulatory networks, axolotl, urodele amphibians, mouse embryonic stem cells, epigenesis, amniote evolution
MeSH terms
Amphibians, Animals, Cell Differentiation, Embryo, Mammalian, Embryo, Nonmammalian, Mammals, Mesoderm, Vertebrates, Xenopus, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review