Cited by 6Epilepsy research and treatmentPharmacological Effects and Toxicity StudiesDrug-Induced Adverse Reactions

End-of-dose emergent psychopathology in ambulatory patients with epilepsy on stable-dose lamotrigine monotherapy: A case series of six patients

Frey, Lauren C., Strom, Laura A., Shrestha, Archana, Spitz, Mark C.·2009·Epilepsy & Behavior

Abstract

Objective Specific psychological withdrawal symptoms following the cessation of treatment with many drugs that affect the central nervous system, including anxiolytics and antidepressants, have been well documented. Studies have investigated withdrawal symptoms associated with some of the older antiepileptic drugs, but the potential for withdrawal symptoms associated with newer antiepileptic drugs, including lamotrigine, has not yet been investigated.Methods Using a retrospective chart review, we identified six patients with epilepsy who reported transient emergent psychological symptoms during stable, chronic lamotrigine monotherapy.Results These symptoms included anxiety, emotional lability, and irritability. In each case, the symptoms resulted in marked subjective distress and reliably occurred in the 1-2h before the patients were due to take their next dose of medication.Conclusions Lamotrigine withdrawal symptoms exist and can occur as an end-of-dose phenomenon, even in patients on stable medication doses. End-of-dose withdrawal from lamotrigine is a clinically significant adverse effect that can hamper successful treatment with this medication.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.yebeh.2009.05.008

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a 1-year multicenter prospective follow-up study of long-acting injectable risperidone adjunctive therapy for treatment-resistant schizophrenia, Kimura et al. found a prevalence of supersensitivity psychosis of 65%.

    “Kimura et al. [158] studied long-acting injectable risperidone as adjunctive therapy to treatment-resistant schizophrenia in a 1-year multicenter prospective follow-up study, the mean dose was equivalent to 1,000 mg/day chlorpromazine. They found a prevalence of SP of 65%.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frey, L. C., Strom, L. A., Shrestha, A., & Spitz, M. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
  • Veterans Health Administration (US)
Corresponding author
Frey, Lauren C.
Venue
Epilepsy & Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-08
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
521-523
ISSN
1525-5050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2027951464
Cited by
6
References
17
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Epilepsy & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions
Keywords
lamotrigine, antiepileptic drug withdrawal, psychopathology, anxiety, emotional lability, irritability, epilepsy, monotherapy, adverse drug reactions, outpatients
MeSH terms
Lamotrigine, Adult, Affective Symptoms, Agoraphobia, Anticonvulsants, Mental Disorders, Bipolar Disorder, Depression, Epilepsy, Female, Humans, Irritable Mood, Male, Middle Aged, Seizures, Triazines, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review