Cited by 239Stress Responses and CortisolNeuroendocrine regulation and behaviorAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

Conditioned defeat in male and female syrian hamsters

Huhman, Kim L, Solomon, Matia B, Janicki, Marcus, Harmon, Alvin C, Lin, Stacie M, Israel, Jeris E, Jasnow, Aaron M·2003·Hormones and Behavior

Abstract

A brief exposure to social defeat in male Syrian hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) leads to profound changes in the subsequent agonistic behavior exhibited by the defeated animals. Following defeat in the home cage of an aggressive conspecific, male hamsters will subsequently fail to defend their home territory even if the intruder is a smaller, nonaggressive male. This phenomenon has been called conditioned defeat. In Experiment 1, we examined the duration of conditioned defeat by repeatedly testing (every 3-5 days) defeated hamsters with a nonaggressive intruder. We found that conditioned defeat occurs in all defeated male hamsters and persists for a prolonged period of time (at least 33 days) in the majority of male hamsters tested despite the fact that these animals are never attacked by the nonaggressive intruders. In Experiment 2, we examined whether conditioned defeat could be induced in female Syrian hamsters. While conditioned defeat occurred in some females, they displayed only low levels of submissive/defensive behavior and, in contrast to males, the conditioned defeat response did not persist beyond the first test. These results suggest that in male hamsters conditioned defeat is a profound, persistent behavioral change characterized by a total absence of territorial aggression and by the frequent display of submissive and defensive behaviors. Conversely, social defeat in female hamsters does not appear to induce long-term behavioral changes. Finally, in Experiment…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2003.05.001

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huhman, K. L., Solomon, M. B., Janicki, M., Harmon, A. C., Lin, S. M., Israel, J. E., & Jasnow, A. M.
Affiliations
Georgia State University (US)
Corresponding author
Huhman, Kim L
Venue
Hormones and Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-09
Volume
44
Issue
3
Pages
293-299
ISSN
0018-506X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2157670485
Cited by
239
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
FWCI
3.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Hormones and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (1f31mh012907-01a1)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH062044, MH12907, MH 62044)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
social defeat, golden hamster, territorial aggression, sex differences, submissiveness, defensive behavior, plasma ACTH, ACTH
MeSH terms
Adrenocorticotropic Hormone, Aggression, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Conditioning, Psychological, Female, Cricetinae, Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System, Male, Mesocricetus, Sex Characteristics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review