CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 102

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A friend in need: Time-dependent effects of stress on social discounting in men

Margittai, Z., Strombach, T., van Wingerden, M., Joëls, M., Schwabe, L., Kalenscher, T.·2015·Hormones and Behavior
DOI 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2015.05.019
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Stress is often associated with a tend-and-befriend response, a putative coping mechanism where people behave generously towards others in order to invest in social relationships to seek comfort and mutual protection. However, this increase in generosity is expected to be directed only towards a delimited number of socially close, but not distant individuals, because it would be maladaptive to befriend everyone alike. In addition, the endocrinological stress response follows a distinct temporal pattern, and it is believed that tend-and-befriend tendencies can be observed mainly under acute stress. By contrast, the aftermath (>1h after) of stress is associated with endocrinological regulatory processes that are proposed to cause increased executive control and reduced emotional reactivity, possibly eliminating the need to tend-and-befriend. In the present experiment, we set out to investigate how these changes immediately and >1h after a stressful experience affect social-distance-dependent generosity levels, a phenomenon called social discounting. We hypothesized that stress has a time-dependent effect on social discounting, with decisions made shortly after (20min), but not 90min after stress showing increased generosity particularly to close others. We found that men tested 20min after stressor onset indeed showed increased generosity towards close but not distant others compared to non-stressed men or men tested 90min after stressor onset. These findings contribute to our…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2015.05.019

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Carver, 1994, Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: the BIS/BAS scales, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 67, 319, 10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.319 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Davis, 1980, A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy, JSAS Cat. Sel. Doc. Psychol., 10, 85
  3. Häusser, 2012, “We” are not stressed: social identity in groups buffers neuroendocrine stress reactions, J. Exp. Soc. Psychol., 48, 973, 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.02.020 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Henckens, 2010, Time-dependent effects of corticosteroids on human amygdala processing, J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci., 30, 12725, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3112-10.2010 · DOI
  5. Hermans, 2014, Dynamic adaptation of large-scale brain networks in response to acute stressors, Trends Neurosci., 37, 304, 10.1016/j.tins.2014.03.006 · DOI
  6. Joëls, 2011, Stress and emotional memory: a matter of timing, Trends Cogn. Sci., 15, 280, 10.1016/j.tics.2011.04.004 · DOI
  7. Jones, 2006, Social discounting, Psychol. Sci., 17, 283, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01699.x · DOI
  8. Leder, 2013, Stress and strategic decision-making in the beauty contest game, Psychoneuroendocrinology, 38, 1503, 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2012.12.016 · DOI
  9. Meule, 2011, Psychometrische evaluation der deutschen Barratt Impulsiveness Scale — Kurzversion (BIS-15), Diagnostica, 57, 126, 10.1026/0012-1924/a000042 · DOI
  10. Porcelli, 2012, Acute stress influences neural circuits of reward processing, Front. Neurosci., 6, 157, 10.3389/fnins.2012.00157 · DOI
  11. Pruessner, 2003, Two formulas for computation of the area under the curve represent measures of total hormone concentration versus time-dependent change, Psychoneuroendocrinology, 28, 916, 10.1016/S0306-4530(02)00108-7 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Randler, 2013, German version of the reduced Morningness–Eveningness Questionnaire (rMEQ), Biol. Rhythm. Res., 44, 730, 10.1080/09291016.2012.739930 · DOI
  13. Rohleder, 2004, Psychosocial stress-induced activation of salivary alpha-amylase: an indicator of sympathetic activity?, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 1032, 258, 10.1196/annals.1314.033 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Schönfeld, 2014, Remembering under stress: different roles of autonomic arousal and glucocorticoids in memory retrieval, Psychoneuroendocrinology, 39, 249, 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.09.020 · DOI
  15. Schwabe, 2013, Stress and multiple memory systems: from “thinking” to “doing”, Trends Cogn. Sci., 17, 60, 10.1016/j.tics.2012.12.001 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Schwabe, 2014, Timing matters: temporal dynamics of stress effects on memory retrieval, Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci., 14, 1041, 10.3758/s13415-014-0256-0 · DOI
  17. Schwabe, 2012, Simultaneous glucocorticoid and noradrenergic activity disrupts the neural basis of goal-directed action in the human brain, J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci., 32, 10146, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1304-12.2012 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Ströber, 2001, The Social Desirability Scale-17 (SDS-17): convergent validity, discriminant validity, and relationship with age, Eur. J. Psychol. Assess., 17
  19. Strombach, 2014, Charity begins at home: cultural differences in social discounting and generosity, J. Behav. Decis. Mak., 27, 235, 10.1002/bdm.1802 · DOI
  20. Strombach, 2015, Social discounting involves modulation of neural value signals by temporoparietal junction, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 112, 1619, 10.1073/pnas.1414715112 · DOI
  21. Takahashi, 2007, Non-reciprocal altruism may be attributable to hyperbolicity in social discounting function, Med. Hypotheses, 68, 184, 10.1016/j.mehy.2006.05.057 · DOI
  22. Takahashi, 2005, Interpersonal trust and social stress-induced cortisol elevation, Neuroreport, 16, 197, 10.1097/00001756-200502080-00027 · DOI
  23. Taylor, 2006, 15(6), 273
  24. Taylor, 2000, Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: tend-and-befriend, not fight-or-flight, Psychol. Rev., 107, 411, 10.1037/0033-295X.107.3.411 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Vinkers, 2013, Time-dependent changes in altruistic punishment following stress, Psychoneuroendocrinology, 38, 1467, 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2012.12.012 · DOI
  26. Von Dawans, 2011, The Trier Social Stress Test for Groups (TSST-G): a new research tool for controlled simultaneous social stress exposure in a group format, Psychoneuroendocrinology, 36, 514, 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2010.08.004 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Von Dawans, 2012, The social dimension of stress reactivity: acute stress increases prosocial behavior in humans, Psychol. Sci., 23, 651, 10.1177/0956797611431576 · DOI
  28. Watson, 1988, Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 54, 1063, 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Margittai, Z., Strombach, T., van Wingerden, M., Joëls, M., Schwabe, L., & Kalenscher, T.
Venue
Hormones and Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-07
Volume
73
Pages
75-82
ISSN
0018-506X
DOI
10.1016/j.yhbeh.2015.05.019
Cited by
102
References
3
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG-KA 2675/4-1)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review