Cited by 520Stress Responses and CortisolHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlSalivary Gland Disorders and Functions

Psychosocial stress-induced activation of salivary alpha-amylase: an indicator of sympathetic activity?

ROHLEDER, NICOLAS, NATER, URS M., WOLF, JUTTA M., EHLERT, ULRIKE, KIRSCHBAUM, CLEMENS·2004·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Assessment of sympathoadrenal medullary system (SAM) activity is only possible to date via measurement of catecholamines in blood plasma or via electrophysiological methods. Both ways of measurement are restricted to endocrinological or psychophysiological laboratories, as both require either immediate freezing of blood samples or complex recording devices. Efforts have therefore been undertaken to find a method comparable to salivary cortisol measurements, in which noninvasive samples can be taken at any place and stored at room temperature for sufficient time before later analysis in the laboratory. Salivary alpha-amylase (sAA) is a candidate that may prove useful in this context. We show here that sAA activity is increased by acute psychosocial stress (Trier Social Stress Test) and that increases in sAA correlate with increases in norepinephrine. We further report that sAA exhibits a stable circadian pattern that mirrors that of salivary cortisol. In conclusion, the current data show that salivary alpha-amylase may serve as an easy-to-use index for SAM activity. However, some questions remain to be answered; for example, what impact does salivary flow rate exert on stress-induced sAA activity?

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1196/annals.1314.033

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
ROHLEDER, N., NATER, U. M., WOLF, J. M., EHLERT, U., & KIRSCHBAUM, C.
Affiliations
  • Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
ROHLEDER, NICOLAS
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-12
Volume
1032
Issue
1
Pages
258-263
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
OpenAlex
W2158976726
Cited by
520
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 35
FWCI
4.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Salivary Gland Disorders and Functions
Keywords
salivary amylase, psychosocial stress, norepinephrine, Trier Social Stress Test, circadian rhythm, salivary cortisol, non-invasive biomarkers, sympathetic activity, salivary flow rate
MeSH terms
Adrenal Medulla, Adult, alpha-Amylases, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Circadian Rhythm, Female, Humans, Kinetics, Male, Middle Aged, Norepinephrine, Predictive Value of Tests, Saliva, Social Environment, Stress, Psychological, Sympathetic Nervous System

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review