Cited by 92Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksComputational Drug Discovery MethodsBiomedical Text Mining and Ontologies

Network-based characterization of drug-regulated genes, drug targets, and toxicity

Open access
Kotlyar, Max, Fortney, Kristen, Jurisica, Igor·2012·Methods

Abstract

Proteins do not exert their effects in isolation of one another, but interact together in complex networks. In recent years, sophisticated methods have been developed to leverage protein-protein interaction (PPI) network structure to improve several stages of the drug discovery process. Network-based methods have been applied to predict drug targets, drug side effects, and new therapeutic indications. In this paper we have two aims. First, we review the past contributions of network approaches and methods to drug discovery, and discuss their limitations and possible future directions. Second, we show how past work can be generalized to gain a more complete understanding of how drugs perturb networks. Previous network-based characterizations of drug effects focused on the small number of known drug targets, i.e., direct binding partners of drugs. However, drugs affect many more genes than their targets - they can profoundly affect the cell's transcriptome. For the first time, we use networks to characterize genes that are differentially regulated by drugs. We found that drug-regulated genes differed from drug targets in terms of functional annotations, cellular localizations, and topological properties. Drug targets mainly included receptors on the plasma membrane, down-regulated genes were largely in the nucleus and were enriched for DNA binding, and genes lacking drug relationships were enriched in the extracellular region. Network topology analysis indicated several significant graph properties, including high degree and betweenness for the drug targets and drug-regulated genes, though possibly due to network biases. Topological analysis also showed that proteins of down-regulated genes appear to be frequently involved in complexes. Analyzing network distances between regulated genes, we found that genes regulated by structurally similar drugs were significantly closer than genes regulated by dissimilar drugs. Finally, network centrality of a drug's differentially regulated genes correlated significantly with drug toxicity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ymeth.2012.06.003

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The degree of toxicity would positively correlate with the degree of connectivity of the genetic network, because the number of affected genes would increase explosively as the complexity of the network increases.

    “the degree of toxicity would positively correlate with the degree of connectivity of the genetic network, because the number of affected genes would increase explosively as the complexity of the network increases [137,138].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kotlyar, M., Fortney, K., & Jurisica, I.
Affiliations
  • University Health Network (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Venue
Methods
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-08
Volume
57
Issue
4
Pages
499-507
ISSN
1046-2023 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2034375284
Cited by
92
References
69
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Methods (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ontario Research Fund (GL2-01-030, CFI #12301, CFI #203383)
  • Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI #29272)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Keywords
protein-protein interaction network, therapeutic target, drug toxicity, adverse drug reactions, network topology, network centrality, network distance, drug discovery, gene expression regulation, protein complexes
MeSH terms
Computer Simulation, Drug Evaluation, Preclinical, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Models, Biological, Cluster Analysis, Statistics, Nonparametric, Protein Interaction Mapping, Drug Discovery, Protein Interaction Maps

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review