Cited by 50Physical Activity and HealthSchool Health and Nursing EducationObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

How can schools help youth increase physical activity? An economic analysis comparing school-based programs

Babey, Susan H., Wu, Shinyi, Cohen, Deborah·2014·Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Objective For optimal health, physical activity should be an integral and routine part of daily life. Youth spend a significant amount of time at school yet rarely achieve the recommended 60 min of moderate and vigorous physical activity in physical education (PE) classes or recess. This study assessed the following types of school-based opportunities to improve physical activity for youth: after-school programs, before-school programs, PE classes, extended-day PE, and short physical activity breaks during the school day. Method An economic analysis conducted in 2013 compared school-based approaches to increasing physical activity. Analysis factors included costs, reach, effects on physical activity gains, cost-effectiveness, and other potentially augmenting benefits. Results Two programs were significantly superior in terms of reach and cost per student: (1) extending the school day with mandatory PE participation and (2) offering short (10-minute) physical activity breaks during regular classroom hours. After-school program costs per student are high and the programs have a smaller reach, but they offer benefits (such as childcare) that may justify their higher costs. Before-school programs did not appear feasible. Conclusion Incorporating short physical activity breaks into the existing school day would be a cost-effective way to increase school-based activity. This type of program is inexpensive and has broad reach. Inserting activity breaks throughout the day is appropriate, especially when youth are otherwise largely sedentary.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.10.013

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Babey, S. H., Wu, S., & Cohen, D.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • RAND Corporation (US)
Corresponding author
Wu, Shinyi
Venue
Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-12
Volume
69
Pages
S55-S60
ISSN
0091-7435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2094945937
Cited by
50
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (R01HL104213)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
children's physical activity, school programs, cost-effectiveness, after-school programs, physical education, extended school day, physical activity breaks, recess, program reach, sedentary youth
MeSH terms
Cost-Benefit Analysis, Health Policy, Humans, Motor Activity, Physical Education and Training, School Health Services, Schools

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review