Cited by 451Physical Education and PedagogyPhysical Activity and HealthSchool Health and Nursing Education

A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions designed to increase moderate-to-vigorous physical activity in school physical education lessons

Lonsdale, Chris, Rosenkranz, Richard R., Peralta, Louisa R., Bennie, Andrew, Fahey, Paul, Lubans, David R.·2013·Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Objectives Physical education (PE) that allows students to engage in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) can play an important role in health promotion. Unfortunately, MVPA levels in PE lessons are often very low. In this review, we aimed to determine the effectiveness of interventions designed to increase the proportion of PE lesson time that students spend in MVPA.Methods In March 2012, we searched electronic databases for intervention studies that were conducted in primary or secondary schools and measured the proportion of lesson time students spent in MVPA. We assessed risk of bias, extracted data, and conducted meta-analyses to determine intervention effectiveness.Results From an initial pool of 12,124 non-duplicate records, 14 studies met the inclusion criteria. Students in intervention conditions spent 24% more lesson time in MVPA compared with students in usual practice conditions (standardized mean difference=0.62).Conclusions Given the small number of studies, moderate-to-high risk of bias, and the heterogeneity of results, caution is warranted regarding the strength of available evidence. However, this review indicates that interventions can increase the proportion of time students spend in MVPA during PE lessons. As most children and adolescents participate in PE, these interventions could lead to substantial public health benefits.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.12.004

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 70 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lonsdale, C., Rosenkranz, R. R., Peralta, L. R., Bennie, A., Fahey, P., & Lubans, D. R.
Affiliations
  • Western Sydney University (AU)
  • Kansas State University (US)
  • University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Lonsdale, Chris
Venue
Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-02
Volume
56
Issue
2
Pages
152-161
ISSN
0091-7435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2003138457
Cited by
451
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Physical Education and Pedagogy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
Keywords
moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, physical education, physical education intervention, children and adolescents, health promotion, intervention effectiveness, primary and secondary schools
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Health Promotion, Humans, Physical Education and Training, School Health Services, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review