Cited by 381Microplastics and Plastic PollutionEnvironmental Toxicology and EcotoxicologyPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts

Risks of Plastic Debris: Unravelling Fact, Opinion, Perception, and Belief

Open access
Koelmans, Albert A., Besseling, Ellen, Foekema, Edwin, Kooi, Merel, Mintenig, Svenja, Ossendorp, Bernadette C., Redondo-Hasselerharm, Paula E., Verschoor, Anja +2 more·2017·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

Researcher and media alarms have caused plastic debris to be perceived as a major threat to humans and animals. However, although the waste of plastic in the environment is clearly undesirable for aesthetic and economic reasons, the actual environmental risks of different plastics and their associated chemicals remain largely unknown. Here we show how a systematic assessment of adverse outcome pathways based on ecologically relevant metrics for exposure and effect can bring risk assessment within reach. Results of such an assessment will help to respond to the current public worry in a balanced way and allow policy makers to take measures for scientifically sound reasons.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.est.7b02219

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Microplastic concentrations spanned environmentally relevant levels (0-1% plastic weight in sediment dry weight) to very high levels, in order to evaluate dose-response relationships and maximize detection of the effect threshold.

    “Concentrations ranged from environmentally relevant (0–1% plastic weight in sediment dw) to very high concentrations, to evaluate dose–response relations and to maximize the chance of accurately detecting the effect threshold.9”

    From Microplastic Effect Thresholds for Freshwater Benthic Macroinvertebrates (2018) · cites this paper as [9]

    In “Measure Effect Thresholds” (page not provided), Koelmans recommends testing a range of concentrations to detect effect thresholds and fit dose–effect models. The paper does not give the claimed 0–1% sediment-dry-weight range or report that such concentrations were used in an experiment; it makes a recommendation rather than describing a completed test. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Effect assessments for microplastics should target traditional ecotoxicological thresholds such as LC50 or EC50, and fitting dose-response models requires sufficient doses and replication.

    “Moreover, an effect assessment for microplastics should aim at detecting the effect thresholds for traditional end points in ecotoxicology (i.e., LC50 or EC50),22 and for this, sufficient doses and replication are needed in order to fit dose–response models, which are commonly used in chemical risk assessment.9”
  • Nonstandardized laboratory bioassays and unrealistic exposure scenarios impede understanding of microplastic risks.

    “The use of nonstandardized laboratory bioassays and unrealistic exposure scenarios hinders the understanding of the risks associated with microplastics.9,22,23”
  • Understanding how microplastics interact with freshwater biota is a high-priority research need, and there is general agreement that exposure risk should be assessed.

    “Understanding the interaction between microplastics and biota in freshwater systems has been identified as a high priority research need4 and there is a general agreement on the idea that an effect assessment should be performed to evaluate the risk of exposure to microplastics.9”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hardesty B. D.; Harari J.; Isobe A.; Lebreton L.; Maximenko N.; Potemra J.; van Sebille E.; Vethaak A. D.; Wilcox C. Using numerical model simulations to improve the understanding of micro-plastic distribution and pathways in the marine environment. Front. Mar. Sci. 2017, 4, 30 10.3389/fmars.2017.00030. · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koelmans, A. A., Besseling, E., Foekema, E., Kooi, M., Mintenig, S., Ossendorp, B. C., Redondo-Hasselerharm, P. E., Verschoor, A., van Wezel, A. P., & Scheffer, M.
Affiliations
  • Wageningen Marine Research (NL)
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (NL)
  • Wageningen University & Research , , P.O. Box 47, ,
  • KWR Watercycle Research Institute , ,
Corresponding author
Koelmans, Albert A.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2017-10-03
Volume
51
Issue
20
Pages
11513-11519
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2761179171
Cited by
381
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
15.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Rivm (National Institute for Public Health and the Environment) (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Rivm Repository (Netherlands National Institute for Public Health and the Environment) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
Keywords
plastic debris, environmental risk assessment, adverse outcome pathways, plastic exposure, risk perception, environmental policy
MeSH terms
Animals, Attitude, Environmental Monitoring, Humans, Plastics, Risk, Waste Products

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review