Cited by 646Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesSleep and Work-Related FatigueCognitive Functions and Memory

Mental fatigue and the control of cognitive processes: effects on perseveration and planning

van der Linden, Dimitri, Frese, Michael, Meijman, Theo F·2003·Acta Psychologica

Abstract

We tested whether behavioural manifestations of mental fatigue may be linked to compromised executive control, which refers to the ability to regulate perceptual and motor processes for goal-directed behaviour. In complex tasks, compromised executive control may become manifest as decreased flexibility and sub-optimal planning. In the study we use the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) and the Tower of London (TOL), which respectively measure flexibility (e.g., perseverative errors) and planning. A simple memory task was used as a control measure. Fatigue was induced through working for 2 h on cognitively demanding tasks. The results showed that compared to a non-fatigued group, fatigued participants displayed more perseveration on the WCST and showed prolonged planning time on the TOL. Fatigue did not affect performance on the simple memory task. These findings indicate compromised executive control under fatigue, which may explain the typical errors and sub-optimal performance that are often found in fatigued people.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0001-6918(02)00150-6

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van der Linden, D., Frese, M., & Meijman, T. F.
Affiliations
University of Groningen (NL)
Venue
Acta Psychologica
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-05
Volume
113
Issue
1
Pages
45-65
ISSN
0001-6918 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2167652505
Cited by
646
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 24
FWCI
3.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Psychologica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
mental fatigue, executive function, perseveration, planning, cognitive flexibility, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, Tower of London, task switching, planning time, cognitive performance
MeSH terms
Adult, Cognition, Mental Fatigue, Female, Humans, Male, Psychological Tests, Reaction Time, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review