Cited by 196School Choice and PerformanceEducational Outcomes and InfluencesEducational Assessment and Improvement

Cognitive fatigue influences students’ performance on standardized tests

Open access
Sievertsen, Hans Henrik, Gino, Francesca, Piovesan, Marco·2016·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Using test data for all children attending Danish public schools between school years 2009/10 and 2012/13, we examine how the time of the test affects performance. Test time is determined by the weekly class schedule and computer availability at the school. We find that, for every hour later in the day, test performance decreases by 0.9% of an SD (95% CI, 0.7-1.0%). However, a 20- to 30-minute break improves average test performance by 1.7% of an SD (95% CI, 1.2-2.2%). These findings have two important policy implications: First, cognitive fatigue should be taken into consideration when deciding on the length of the school day and the frequency and duration of breaks throughout the day. Second, school accountability systems should control for the influence of external factors on test scores.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1516947113

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Holding D (1983) Fatigue. Stress and Fatigue in Human Performance (John Wiley & Sons, New York).
  2. Yoon C, May CP, Hasher L (1999) Aging, circadian arousal patterns, and cognition. Aging, Cognition and Self Reports, eds Schwarz N, Park D, Knauper B, Sudman S (Psychological Press, Washington, DC), pp 117-143.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sievertsen, H. H., Gino, F., & Piovesan, M.
Affiliations
  • Danish National Centre for Social Research (DK)
  • Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02163;
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2016-02-16
Volume
113
Issue
10
Pages
2621-2624
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2281113764
Cited by
194
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5
FWCI
81.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond (09-070295)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Outcomes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Educational Assessment and Improvement
Keywords
mental fatigue, standardized test performance, school holidays, school day length, computer availability, school accountability, academic performance, Danish public schools
MeSH terms
Achievement, Algorithms, Child, Cognition, Denmark, Educational Measurement, Mental Fatigue, Humans, Learning, Models, Theoretical, Schools, Students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review