Cited by 239Career Development and DiversityEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessPersonality Traits and Psychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The relation of self-efficacy and interests: a meta-analysis of 60 samples

Rottinghaus, Patrick J, Larson, Lisa M, Borgen, Fred H·2003·Journal of Vocational Behavior

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0001-8791(02)00039-8

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 52 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. *Bieschke, K. J. (1991). A causal model of math/science career aspirations. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing
  2. *Blaisdell, S. L. (2000). Social cognitive theory predictors of entry into engineering majors for high school students. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Arizona State University, Tempe
  3. Cronen, S. M. (1999). The effect of occupational stereotypes and gender identity on women’s career beliefs. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Washington University, St. Louis, MO
  4. Layton, P. L. (1984). Self-efficacy, locus of control, career salience, and women’s career choice. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
  5. *Lindley, L. D. (2001). Personality, dispositional variables, and human adaptability. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Iowa State University, Ames, IA
  6. *Richardson, A. W. (2000). The relationship between racial identity attitudes, career self-efficacy and interests. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Loyola University, Chicago
  7. *Smith-Weber, S. M. (1998). The influence of social cognitive career theory on African-American female adolescents’ career development. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Missouri, Columbia
  8. *Strychasz, G. M. (1999). Mathematics self-efficacy: A social cognitive intervention for elementary school children. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Arizona State University, Tempe
  9. *Witherspoon, K. M. (1998). The influences of Africentric values, perceptions of racism, and self-efficacy beliefs on African Americans’ career interests. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Loyola University, Chicago

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rottinghaus, P. J., Larson, L. M., & Borgen, F. H.
Affiliations
Iowa State University (US)
Corresponding author
Rottinghaus, Patrick J
Venue
Journal of Vocational Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-04
Volume
62
Issue
2
Pages
221-236
ISSN
0001-8791 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2014802914
Cited by
238
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 6
FWCI
7.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Vocational Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Career Development and Diversity
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
self-efficacy, interest, career interest, mathematics self-efficacy, science self-efficacy, gender differences, sex differences, age differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review