Cited by 467Dietetics, Nutrition, and EducationNursing Diagnosis and DocumentationHealthcare Quality and Management

Nutrition care process and model: ADA adopts road map to quality care and outcomes management

Lacey, Karen, Pritchett, Ellen·2003·Journal of the American Dietetic Association

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0002-8223(03)00971-4

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lacey, K., & Pritchett, E.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Green Bay (US)
Venue
Journal of the American Dietetic Association
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-08
Volume
103
Issue
8
Pages
1061-1072
ISSN
0002-8223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1985104625
Cited by
467
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 13
FWCI
30.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Dietetic Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Dietetics, Nutrition, and Education
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
Keywords
Nutrition Care Process, American Dietetic Association, professional standards, outcomes management, strategic planning
MeSH terms
Dietary Services, Humans, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Quality Assurance, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review