Cited by 141Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management

Improving the quality of anticoagulation of patients with atrial fibrillation in managed care organizations: results of the managing anticoagulation services trial

Matchar, David B, Samsa, Gregory P, Cohen, Stuart J, Oddone, Eugene Z, Jurgelski, Annette E·2002·The American Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Randomized trials have indicated that well-managed anticoagulation with warfarin could prevent more than half of the strokes related to atrial fibrillation. However, many patients with atrial fibrillation who are eligible for this therapy either do not receive it or are not maintained within an optimal prothrombin time-international normalized ratio (INR) range. We sought to determine whether an anticoagulation service within a managed care organization would be a feasible alternative for providing anticoagulation care. We performed a multi-site randomized trial in six large managed care organizations in the United States. Subjects were aged 65 years or older and had nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. At each site, physician practices were divided into two geographically defined practice clusters; each site was randomly assigned to have one intervention and one control cluster. The intervention cluster received an anticoagulation service that satisfied specifications for high-quality anticoagulation care and was coordinated through the managed care organization. Control clusters continued with their usual provider-based care. We measured the proportion of time that warfarin-treated patients in each of the clusters (intervention and control) were in the target range for the INR at baseline, and again during a follow-up period. Five of the six selected sites succeeded at developing an anticoagulation service. Patients in the intervention and control clusters had similar demographic characteristics, contraindications to warfarin, and risk factors for stroke. Among patients (n = 144 in the intervention clusters; n = 118 in the control clusters) for whom data were available during the baseline and follow-up periods, the changes in percentages of time in the target range were similar for those in the intervention clusters (baseline: 47.7%; follow-up: 55.6%) and in the control clusters (baseline: 49.1%; follow-up: 52.3%; intervention effect: 5%; 95% confidence interval: -5% to 14%; P = 0.32). Although it was feasible in a managed care organization to implement anticoagulation services that were tailored to local circumstances, provision of this service did not improve anticoagulation care compared with usual care. The effect of the anticoagulation service was limited by the utilization of the service, the degree to which the referring physician supports strict adherence to recommended target ranges for the INR, and the ability of the anticoagulation service to identify and to respond to out-of-range values promptly.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0002-9343(02)01131-2

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Matchar, D. B., Samsa, G. P., Cohen, S. J., Oddone, E. Z., & Jurgelski, A. E.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Matchar, David B
Venue
The American Journal of Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-07
Volume
113
Issue
1
Pages
42-51
ISSN
0002-9343 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2063025825
Cited by
141
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 13
FWCI
5.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Internal Medicine › Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
atrial fibrillation, anticoagulation management, warfarin, INR control, managed care organizations, anticoagulation service, stroke prevention, non-valvular atrial fibrillation, older adults, quality of care, implementation feasibility, time in therapeutic range, usual care comparison
MeSH terms
Aged, Anticoagulants, Atrial Fibrillation, Female, Health Maintenance Organizations, Humans, Male, Managed Care Programs, Prothrombin Time, Quality of Health Care, Risk Factors, United States, Warfarin, International Normalized Ratio, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review