Cited by 302Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management

Adverse outcomes and predictors of underuse of antithrombotic therapy in medicare beneficiaries with chronic atrial fibrillation

Gage, Brian F., Boechler, Michael, Doggette, Amy L., Fortune, Gary, Flaker, Greg C., Rich, Michael W., Radford, Martha J.·2000·Stroke

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Antithrombotic therapy can prevent strokes and transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) in carefully selected patients who have chronic nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Our objectives were 3-fold: to document the use of warfarin and aspirin therapy in Missouri Medicare beneficiaries with chronic NVAF; to identify factors associated with warfarin and aspirin underuse; and to determine the association between prescription of warfarin and aspirin at hospital discharge and adverse outcomes in this elderly, frail population. METHODS: We linked chart reviews from all Missouri hospitals to Medicare claims data from 1993 to 1996. From chart reviews, we documented Medicare beneficiaries' demographic factors, comorbid conditions, and antithrombotic therapy prescribed at the time of hospital discharge. From Medicare claims, we determined the date of outcomes-death from any cause or hospitalization for an ischemic event (a stroke, a TIA, or a myocardial infarction). RESULTS: Only 328 (55%) of the 597 Medicare beneficiaries were prescribed antithrombotic therapy at hospital discharge: 34% received warfarin and 21% received aspirin. Advanced age, female gender, and rural residency predicted underuse of antithrombotic therapy. After controlling for these factors, as well as stroke risk factors and contraindications to anticoagulation, the prescription of warfarin was associated with a 24% relative risk reduction (RRR) in adverse outcomes (P=0.003). Prescription of aspirin was associated with a nonsignificant 5% RRR in these events (P=0.56). CONCLUSIONS: The underuse of antithrombotic therapy in Medicare beneficiaries who have NVAF is associated with measurable adverse outcomes. The benefit of warfarin therapy may extend to frail, elderly patients, a group that was excluded from randomized controlled trials. The role of antiplatelet therapy in this population deserves further study because many of these patients have relative contraindications to warfarin.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.str.31.4.822

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Investigators. Warfarin versus aspirin for prevention of thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation: Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation II Study. Lancet. 1994;343:687-691.
  2. Feinberg WM, Blackshear JL, Laupacis A, Kronmal R, Hart RG. Prev- alence, age distribution, and gender of patients with atrial fibrillation. Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:469 -473.
  3. Walker GA. Logistic regression. In: Common Statistical Methods for Clinical Research with SAS® Examples. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc; 1996:225-242.
  4. Petty GW, Brown RD, Whisnant JP, Sicks JD, O'Fallon M, Wiebers DO. Frequency of major complications of aspirin, warfarin, and intravenous heparin for secondary stroke prevention. Ann Intern Med. 1998;130: 14 -22.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gage, B. F., Boechler, M., Doggette, A. L., Fortune, G., Flaker, G. C., Rich, M. W., & Radford, M. J.
Affiliations
Yale New Haven Hospital (US)
Venue
Stroke
Published
2000-04
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
822-827
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W2030279551
Cited by
302
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 18
FWCI
9.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Stroke (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
  • American Heart Association
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Internal Medicine › Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
antithrombotic therapy, warfarin, aspirin, underuse of anticoagulation, antiplatelet therapy, stroke prevention, transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction, hospital discharge prescribing, Medicare beneficiaries, elderly patients, vulnerable patients, adverse outcomes
MeSH terms
Aged, Atrial Fibrillation, Chronic Disease, Drug Utilization, Female, Fibrinolytic Agents, Medicare, Humans, Male, Sampling Studies, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review