Cited by 180Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlCardiac Health and Mental Health

Is syncope a risk factor for poor outcomes? comparison of patients with and without syncope

Kapoor, Wishwa N., Hanusa, Barbara H.·1996·The American Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Objective To determine whether syncope, independent of underlying comorbidities, is associated with increased mortality or other cardiovascular outcomes. Patients and methods A prospective cohort study of patients with syncope and a group of patients without syncope matched with respect to age, gender, site of care (inpatient/ outpatient) and a cardiac disease index at an urban university medical center. Overall mortality, cardiac mortality, cardiovascular outcomes, and occurrence of syncope within 1 year of study enrollment were compared between the groups with Kaplan-Meier rates and Mantel-Cox statistics. Results The characteristics of 470 patients with syncope and the matched patients without syncope were similar except that the patients without syncope had more cardiac diseases than those with syncope (P = 0.002). Patients with and without syncope had similar rates of 1-year overall mortality (9% versus 11%, P = 0.29) and cardiac mortality (3% versus 6%, P = 0.08). In multivariate analyses, syncope was not a significant predictor of overall or cardiac mortality, but male gender, age > 55 years, and congestive heart failure were. One-year rates for other cardiovascular outcomes (myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, cardiac arrest with survival, and cerebrovascular events) in patients with syncope were similar to those in patients without syncope (P > or = 0.2 for all comparisons). Patients with syncope had a 20.2% recurrence rate in 1 year as compared with a 2.…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0002-9343(95)00052-6

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kapoor, W. N., & Hanusa, B. H.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
The American Journal of Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-06
Volume
100
Issue
6
Pages
646-655
ISSN
0002-9343 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2066476623
Cited by
180
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 12
FWCI
3.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Public Health Service (K04L 01899)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Keywords
syncope, mortality, cardiac mortality, cardiovascular outcomes, syncope recurrence, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular events, cardiac arrest, risk factors, underlying heart disease
MeSH terms
Cause of Death, Female, Heart Diseases, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Risk, Risk Factors, Syncope, Multivariate Analysis, Survival Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review