Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 415

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Doppler ultrasonography in high-risk pregnancies: Systematic review with meta-analysis

Alfirevic, Zarkok, Neilson, James P.·1995·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
DOI 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90466-2
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90466-2

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Fitzgerald, 1977, Non-invasive measurement of human fetal circulation using ultrasound: a new method, BMJ, 2, 1450, 10.1136/bmj.2.6100.1450 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Giles, 1985, Fetal umbilical artery flow velocity waveforms and placental resistance: pathological correlation, Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 92, 31, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1985.tb01045.x · DOI · Paper page
  3. Trudinger, 1985, Fetal umbilical artery flow velocity waveforms and placental resistance: clinical significance, Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 92, 23, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1985.tb01044.x · DOI · Paper page
  4. Trudinger, 1991, Fetal umbilical artery velocity waveforms and subsequent neonatal outcome, Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 98, 378, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1991.tb13428.x · DOI · Paper page
  5. Neilson JP. Doppler ultrasound in high risk pregnancies. In: Enkin MW, Keirse MJNC, Renfrew MJ, Neilson JP, eds. Pregnancy and childbirth module. Oxford: Update Software 1993, disk issue 2. (Cochrane database of systematic reviews, review no 03889.)
  6. McParland, 1988, Review article: Doppler blood flow in pregnancy, Placenta, 9, 427, 10.1016/0143-4004(88)90055-0 · DOI
  7. Tyrell, 1990, Randomized comparison of routine vs highly selective use of Doppler ultrasound and biophysical scoring to investigate high risk pregnancies, Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 97, 909, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1990.tb02446.x · DOI
  8. Hofmeyr, 1991, Umbilical artery resistance index as a screening test for fetal well-being. II. Randomized feasibility study, Obstet Gynecol, 78, 359
  9. Newnham, 1991, Doppler flow velocity waveform analysis in high risk pregnancies: a randomized controlled trial, Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 98, 956, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1991.tb15332.x · DOI
  10. Johnstone, 1993, The effect of introduction of umbilical Doppler recordings to obstetric practice, Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 100, 733, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1993.tb14264.x · DOI
  11. Pattison, 1994, The role of Doppler velocimetry in the management of high risk pregnancies, Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 101, 114, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13075.x · DOI
  12. Davies, 1992, Randomised controlled trial of Doppler ultrasound screening of placental perfusion during pregnancy, Lancet, 340, 1299, 10.1016/0140-6736(92)92490-7 · DOI
  13. Schneider, 1992, Doppler flow measurements as a screening method during pregnancy: is it worth the effort?, J Mat Fet Invest, 1, 125
  14. Mason, 1993, Randomised comparison of routine vs highly selective use of Doppler ultrasound in low risk pregnancies, Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 100, 130, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1993.tb15207.x · DOI
  15. Newnham, 1993, Effects of frequent ultrasound during pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial, Lancet, 342, 887, 10.1016/0140-6736(93)91944-H · DOI · Paper page
  16. Whittle, 1994, Screening for the compromised fetus: a randomized trial of umbilical artery velocimetry in unselected pregnancies, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 170, 555, 10.1016/S0002-9378(94)70226-8 · DOI
  17. Gonsoulin, 1991, Umbilical artery Doppler waveform analysis: a randomized study on effect on outcome, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 164, 370, 10.1016/0002-9378(91)91191-X · DOI
  18. Nimrod, 1992, The utility of pulsed Doppler studies in the evaluation of postdate pregnancies, J Mat Fet Invest, 1, 127
  19. Neilson JP. Routine Doppler ultrasound in unselected pregnancies. In: Enkin MW, Keirse MJNC, Renfrew MJ, Neilson JP, eds. Pregnancy and childbirth module. Oxford: Update Software 1993: disk issue 2. (Cochrane database of systematic reviews, review no 07357.)
  20. Neilson JP. Cardiotocography for antepartum fetal assessment. In: Enkin MW, Keirse MJNC, Renfrew MJ, Neilson JP, eds. Pregnancy and childbirth module. Oxford: Update Software 1993: disk issue 2. (Cochrane database of systematic reviews, review no 03881.)

Cited by

See all 415

Metadata

Authors
Alfirevic, Z., & Neilson, J. P.
Venue
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-05
Volume
172
Issue
5
Pages
1379-1387
ISSN
0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/0002-9378(95)90466-2
OpenAlex
W2134137349
Cited by
415
References
1
FWCI
3.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Doppler ultrasonography in high-risk pregnancies: Systematic review with meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0002-9378(95)90466-2
The paper
Alfirevic, Z., & Neilson, J. P. (1995). Doppler ultrasonography in high-risk pregnancies: Systematic review with meta-analysis. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(95)90466-2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.