Cited by 212Balance, Gait, and Falls PreventionMotor Control and AdaptationErgonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders

Biomechanical assessment of quiet standing and changes associated with aging

Panzer, Victoria P., Bandinelli, Stephania, Hallett, Mark·1995·Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Abstract

The kinematics of standing balance were analyzed in 24 normal subjects, aged 21 to 78 years, to examine differences attributable to age, visual input, and sex. Movements of individual body segments, displacement of the center of gravity (COG), and position of the center of pressure (COP) were measured, and total path length and variability about the mean position were derived from the resulting values. Aging was associated with an increase in variability of the COG, head, and hip, but not in path length. The changes, which may be clinically interpreted as excess postural sway, do not show stability deficits as a consequence of aging. On the contrary, older subjects seem to adopt a postural control strategy that achieves comparable stability during quiet standing. Eye closure increased the anterior-posterior COP path length without corresponding changes in the COG, indicating an increase in small accelerations without associated instability. There was more medial-lateral movement in women than in men. Quantitative electromyographic measures showed that, in general, quiet standing requires very little muscular activity. We conclude that the task of quiet standing produces no evidence of postural instability concurrent with aging. The altered postural control strategy may be less effective when balance is suddenly or severely compromised.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0003-9993(95)80024-7

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Dempster, 1956, Space requirements of the seated operator, Wright Air Development Center Technical Report, 55
  2. Welford, 1984, Between bodily changes and performance: some possible reasons for slowing with age, Exp Aging Res, 10, 73, 10.1080/03610738408258548 · DOI
  3. Winter, 1993, Medial-lateral and anteriorposterior motor responses associated with COP changes in quiet standing, Neurosci Res Commun, 12, 141

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Panzer, V. P., Bandinelli, S., & Hallett, M.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Hallett, Mark
Venue
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-02
Volume
76
Issue
2
Pages
151-157
ISSN
0003-9993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1985850859
Cited by
212
References
34
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 12
FWCI
16.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
Keywords
quiet standing, aging, postural control, postural sway, center of pressure, center of gravity, visual input, sex differences, electromyography, postural stability
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aging, Biomechanical Phenomena, Electromyography, Postural Balance, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Posture, Muscle, Skeletal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review