The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Embodied Cognition: A field guide
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception
Bornstein, M. H., & Gibson, J. J. (1980) · The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism · doi:10.2307/429816 · Cited by 22,935
Picard, R. W. (1997) · MIT Press · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1140.001.0001 · Cited by 7,382
Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics and Culture in Everyday Life
Lave, J. (1988) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609268 · Cited by 5,148
Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science
Hacking, I. (1983) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511814563 · Cited by 4,814
Harnad, S. (1990) · Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena · doi:10.1016/0167-2789(90)90087-6 · Cited by 4,235 · cited 2×
“This is perhaps the most important theoretical upshot of Brooks’ work: the knowledgeis-everything approach of GOFAI, exemplified especially by Douglas Lenat and the others involved in Cyc, can never work, for such a system lacks the resources to ground its representations [52,53].”
A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness
O'Regan, J. K., & Noë, A. (2001) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x01000115 · Cited by 3,126
The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (2017) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262529365.001.0001 · Cited by 2,449
On Distinguishing Epistemic from Pragmatic Action
Kirsh, D., & Maglio, P. (1994) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1804_1 · Cited by 1,641 · cited 2×
“[W]e should acknowledge an important role for what Kirsh and Maglio [67] nicely term 'epistemic actions': namely, actions whose purpose is not to alter the world so as to advance physically toward some goal (e.g., laying a brick for a walk), but rather to alter the world so as to help make available information requir…”
BackgroundWhat computers still can't do: a critique of artificial reason
Penny, S., & Dreyfus, H. (1994) · Leonardo · doi:10.2307/1575958 · Cited by 1,637
Dreyfus, H. L. (2002) · Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1023/a:1021351606209 · Cited by 569
Cited by
An integrated theory of language production and comprehension
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2013) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x12001495 · Cited by 1,569
Neural reuse: A fundamental organizational principle of the brain
Anderson, M. L. (2010) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x10000853 · Cited by 1,212
Self-citationFormative Assessment: Assessment Is for Self-regulated Learning
Clark, I. (2012) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-011-9191-6 · Cited by 688
Bots increase exposure to negative and inflammatory content in online social systems
Stella, M., Ferrara, E., & De Domenico, M. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1803470115 · Cited by 492
Vernon, D., Metta, G., & Sandini, G. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/tevc.2006.890274 · Cited by 414
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderson, M. L.
- Venue
- Artificial Intelligence
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-09
- Volume
- 149
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 91-130
- ISSN
- 0004-3702 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2133196698
- Cited by
- 1,128
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 7.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Embodied Cognition: A field guide. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0004-3702(03)00054-7
- The paper
- Anderson, M. L. (2003). Embodied Cognition: A field guide. Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0004-3702(03)00054-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
