Cited by 35Behavioral and Psychological StudiesDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsEducational Games and Gamification

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Intrinsic interest and extrinsic reward: The effects of a continuing token program on continuing nonconstrained preference

Davidson, Paul, Bucher, Bradley·1978·Behavior Therapy

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0005-7894(78)80107-5

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 10 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Greene, 1974, How to turn play into work, Psychology Today, 8, 49

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 35

Metadata

Authors
Davidson, P., & Bucher, B.
Affiliations
Western University (CA)
Corresponding author
Davidson, Paul
Venue
Behavior Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1978-03
Volume
9
Issue
2
Pages
222-234
ISSN
0005-7894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2068982270
Cited by
35
References
10
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Behavior Therapy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Games and Gamification
Keywords
token reinforcement, intrinsic interest, extrinsic rewards, preschool children, choice behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review