Cited by 194Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchMigration, Health and TraumaPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Treatment of pharmacotherapy-refractory posttraumatic stress disorder among Cambodian refugees: a pilot study of combination treatment with cognitive-behavior therapy vs sertraline alone

Otto, Michael W., Hinton, Devon, Korbly, Nicole B., Chea, Andrea, Ba, Phalnarith, Gershuny, Beth S., Pollack, Mark H.·2003·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

Cambodian refugees with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) represent a cohort in severe need of treatment, but little information is available to guide treatment choices. We selected a sample of pharmacotherapy-refractory individuals to test the efficacy of combination treatment with sertraline and cognitive-behavior therapy (CBT) for treating PTSD. Participants in this pilot study were ten Khmer-speaking women who had been at a mean age of 22-26 years during the Pol Pot period (1975-1979). These patients were randomly assigned to either sertraline alone or combined treatment. We found that combined treatment offered additional benefit in the range of medium to large effect sizes for PTSD and associated symptoms. Our findings indicate that substantial gains can be achieved by adding CBT to pharmacotherapy for PTSD, and that a program of CBT emphasizing information, exposure, and cognitive-restructuring can be successfully modified for Khmer-speaking refugees.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0005-7967(03)00032-9

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Otto, M. W., Hinton, D., Korbly, N. B., Chea, A., Ba, P., Gershuny, B. S., & Pollack, M. H.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • North Suffolk Mental Health Association (US)
Corresponding author
Otto, Michael W.
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-11
Volume
41
Issue
11
Pages
1271-1276
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2095335279
Cited by
194
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
12.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Van Ameringen Foundation
  • Pfizer Pharmaceuticals
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, sertraline, cognitive behavioral therapy, combination therapy, Cambodian refugees, trauma exposure, cognitive restructuring, culturally tailored interventions
MeSH terms
Adult, Antidepressive Agents, Cambodia, Combined Modality Therapy, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Refugees, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, United States, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Sertraline

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review