Cited by 506Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMemory Processes and InfluencesIdentity, Memory, and Therapy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cognitive processes in social anxiety: the effects of self-focus, rumination and anticipatory processing

Mellings, Tanna M.B, Alden, Lynn E·2000·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

We examined three cognitive processes hypothesized to contribute to biases in judgments about and memory for social events: self-focused attention, post-event rumination, and anticipatory processing. Socially anxious (N = 58) and nonanxious (N = 58) subjects participated in a social interaction and then completed measures of self-focused attention and anxiety-related physiological sensations and behavior. The next day, subjects completed measures that assessed frequency of post-event processing and recall of the interaction. The results indicated that selective attention to negative self-related information led to biases in social judgments and recollections and that post-event processing contributed to the recall of negative self-related information. No evidence was found for selective retrieval of negative self-related information prior to a second social interaction. The results reconcile inconsistent previous findings related to memory bias in social anxiety.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0005-7967(99)00040-6

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 0 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Alden, 1995, Social phobia and social appraisal in successful and unsuccessful interactions, Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33, 497, 10.1016/0005-7967(94)00088-2 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Alden, 1992, Public self-awareness and withdrawal from social interactions, Cognitive Therapy and Research, 16, 249, 10.1007/BF01183280 · DOI
  3. Chambless, 1984, Assessment of fear of fear in agoraphobics: the body sensations questionnaire and the agoraphobic cognitions questionnaire, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52, 1090, 10.1037/0022-006X.52.6.1090 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Dodge, 1988, Evaluation of the Social Interaction Self-Statement Test with a social phobic population, Cognitive Therapy and Research, 12, 211, 10.1007/BF01204932 · DOI
  5. Hope, 1990, Social anxiety and the recall of interpersonal information, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 4, 185, 10.1891/0889-8391.4.2.185 · DOI
  6. Lucock, 1988, Cognitive factors in social anxiety and its treatment, Behaviour Research and Therapy, 26, 297, 10.1016/0005-7967(88)90081-2 · DOI
  7. Lundh, 1996, Recognition bias for critical faces in social phobics, Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34, 787, 10.1016/0005-7967(96)00035-6 · DOI
  8. Mathews, 1994, Cognitive approaches to emotion and emotional disorders, Annual Review of Psychology, 45, 25, 10.1146/annurev.ps.45.020194.000325 · DOI · Paper page
  9. McEwan, 1983, Is increased arousal in social anxiety noticed by others?, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 92, 417, 10.1037/0021-843X.92.4.417 · DOI
  10. O'Banion, 1977, Social anxiety and selective memory for affective information about the self, Social Behavior and Personality, 5, 321, 10.2224/sbp.1977.5.2.321 · DOI
  11. Rapee, 1992, Discrepancy between self and observer ratings of performance in social phobics, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 101, 728, 10.1037/0021-843X.101.4.728 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Rapee, 1994, Memory bias in social phobia, Behaviour Research and Therapy, 32, 89, 10.1016/0005-7967(94)90087-6 · DOI
  13. Watson, 1969, Measurement of social-evaluative anxiety, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33, 448, 10.1037/h0027806 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Woody, 1996, Effects of focus of attention on anxiety levels and social performance of individuals with social phobia, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 105, 61, 10.1037/0021-843X.105.1.61 · DOI
  15. Woody, 1997, Self-focused attention in the treatment of social phobia, Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35, 117, 10.1016/S0005-7967(96)00084-8 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 429

Metadata

Authors
Mellings, T. M. B., & Alden, L. E.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Alden, Lynn E
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-03
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
243-257
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2062470464
Cited by
506
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 28
FWCI
13.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
Keywords
social anxiety, self-focus, post-event rumination, anticipatory processing, memory bias, social judgment, self-related information, selective attention
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Animals, Anxiety, Cognition, Double-Blind Method, Ego, Female, Humans, Judgment, Male, Memory, Phobic Disorders, Random Allocation, Social Behavior, Social Perception, Self Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review