Cited by 3,467Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Testing and AssessmentPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Measurement of social-evaluative anxiety.

Watson, David, Friend, Ronald·1969·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0027806

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Watson, D., & Friend, R.
Affiliations
University of Hawaii System (US)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
1969
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
448-457
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2065589549
Cited by
3,467
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 90 · 2025: 131 · 2024: 110 · 2023: 120 · 2022: 106 · 2021: 85 · 2020: 93 · 2019: 80 · 2018: 97 · 2017: 78 · 2016: 86 · 2015: 109 · 2014: 116 · 2013: 111 · 2012: 102
FWCI
10.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
anxiety assessment, psychometric assessment, social anxiety
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Humans, Psychological Tests, Social Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review