A potential role for thalamocingulate circuitry in human maternal behavior
Abstract
Background Little is known about the regional brain basis of human maternal behavior. To understand this better, we have been examining brain activity in mothers listening to infant cries.Methods We measured functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging brain activity in healthy, breastfeeding first-time mothers with young infants while they listened to infant cries, white noise control sounds, and a rest condition. Based on the thalamocingulate theory of maternal behavior and pilot work, we hypothesized that the cingulate, medial thalamus, medial prefrontal cortex, and right orbitofrontal cortex would display more activity with infant cries than with white noise (comparison 1) and would uniquely activate with the cries, meaning that these regions would display activity with cry minus rest but not with white noise minus rest (comparison 2).Results In hypothesized regions, the group displayed more activity in the medial thalamus, medial prefrontal and right orbitofrontal cortices with both comparisons. The anterior and posterior cingulate cortex displayed more activity only with comparison 1. In non-hypothesized brain regions, several other structures thought important in rodent maternal behavior displayed activity with both comparisons including the midbrain, hypothalamus, dorsal and ventral striatum, and vicinity of the lateral septal region.Conclusions Our results partially support our hypotheses and are generally consistent with neuroanatomical studies of rodent maternal behavior.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The striatum is activated in response to face images of a mother's own child compared to unknown (or familiar but unrelated) children, as well as to infant cry stimuli.
“Several studies have shown that the striatum, a key projection of midbrain dopamine neurons which includes the putamen and caudate head, is activated in response to face images of a mother’s own child compared to unknown (or familiar but unrelated) children (22;23), as well as to infant cry stimuli (18).”
From What’s in a smile? Maternal brain responses to infant facial cues (2008) · cites this paper as [18]
Other fMRI studies have only demonstrated activation of these areas in mothers of younger babies, during the first few months of life, suggesting these regions may be more important during the early postpartum period.
“However, other fMRI studies have only demonstrated activation of these areas in mothers of younger babies, during the first few months of life (18, 24), suggesting that these regions may be more important during the early postpartum period.”
From What’s in a smile? Maternal brain responses to infant facial cues (2008) · cites this paper as [18]
The sound of a baby cry activates the hypothalamus and triggers oxytocin plasma elevations in human mothers.
“the sound of a baby cry activates the hypothalamus (Lorberbaum et al., 2002) and triggers oxytocin plasma elevations in human mothers (McNeilly et al., 1983)”
From Neuromodulation of maternal circuits by oxytocin (2019) · cites this paper as Lorberbaum et al., 2002
Infant stimuli trigger simultaneous responses in different brain areas of mothers.
“Infant stimuli trigger simultaneous responses in different brain areas of mothers (Febo et al., 2008; Lorberbaum et al., 2002; Sander and Scheich, 2005), but it remains to be explored if oxytocin acts simultaneously in different cortical areas to gate these responses; or, alternatively, if oxytocin signaling is restricted to specific regions.”
From Neuromodulation of maternal circuits by oxytocin (2019) · cites this paper as Lorberbaum et al., 2002
Lorberbaum et al. were the first group to study brain activity in mothers, in which they listened to other-baby-cries, highlighting the importance of a thalamocingulate circuit for an emotional response and regulation.
“Lorberbaum et al. (13) were the first group to study brain activity in mothers, in which they listened to other-baby-cries, highlighting the importance of a thalamocingulate circuit for an emotional response and regulation.”
From Neuroendocrinology of Parental Response to Baby‐Cry (2011) · cites this paper as [13]
Activation of the medial and lateral PFC and ACC is consistently observed among new mothers in response to an infant's cry, to videos of a distressed infant, and to one's own child greater than to familiar/unknown faces.
“Activation of the medial and lateral PFC and ACC are consistently observed among new mothers in response to an infant’s cry (Laurent and Ablow, 2012; Lorberbaum et al., 2002), to videos of a distressed infant (Noriuchi et al., 2008), and to one’s own child greater than to familiar/unknown faces (Leibenluft et al., 2004) were observed among new mothers.”
From The maternal brain and its plasticity in humans (2016) · cites this paper as Lorberbaum et al., 2002
In Lorberbaum et al. (2002), 10 healthy breastfeeding first-time mothers with infants 1-2 months old showed activated regions including anterior and posterior cingulate, thalamus, midbrain, hypothalamus, septal regions, dorsal and ventral striatum, medial prefrontal cortex, right orbitofrontal/insula/temporal polar cortex region, and right lateral temporal cortex and fusiform gyrus in response to
“Activated regions included the anterior and posterior cingulate, thalamus, midbrain, hypothalamus, septal regions, dorsal and ventral striatum, medial prefrontal cortex, right orbitofrontal/insula/temporal polar cortex region, and right lateral temporal cortex and fusiform gyrus.”
From The human parental brain: In vivo neuroimaging (2011) · cites this paper as Lorberbaum et al., 2002
When cry response was compared with inter-stimulus rest periods instead of control sound, the amygdala was active.
“Additionally, when cry response was compared with the inter-stimulus rest periods, instead of the control sound (which some mothers judged to be aversive), the amygdala was active.”
From The human parental brain: In vivo neuroimaging (2011) · cites this paper as Lorberbaum et al., 2002
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 86 · Cited by 359
- Authors
- Lorberbaum, J. P., Newman, J. D., Horwitz, A. R., Dubno, J. R., Lydiard, R. B., Hamner, M. B., Bohning, D. E., & George, M. S.
- Affiliations
- Medical University of South Carolina (US)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lorberbaum, Jeffrey P.
- Venue
- Biological Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-03
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 431-445
- ISSN
- 0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2033138858
- Cited by
- 359
- References
- 86
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 23
- FWCI
- 22.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS040259, R01 NS 40259)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Infant Health and Development
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
- Keywords
- maternal behavior, infant crying, medial thalamus, anterior cingulate cortex, posterior cingulate cortex, medial prefrontal cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, breastfeeding mothers, hypothalamus, striatum, lateral septum
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Arousal, Brain Mapping, Dominance, Cerebral, Female, Frontal Lobe, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Maternal Behavior, Nerve Net, Preoptic Area, Thalamic Nuclei, Prefrontal Cortex
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review