Cited by 1,754Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsAdvanced Fluorescence Microscopy TechniquesCell Image Analysis Techniques

Transcriptome-scale super-resolved imaging in tissues by RNA seqFISH

Open access
Eng, Chee-Huat Linus, Lawson, Michael, Zhu, Qian, Dries, Ruben, Koulena, Noushin, Takei, Yodai, Yun, Jina, Cronin, Christopher +3 more·2019·Nature

Abstract

Imaging the transcriptome in situ with high accuracy has been a major challenge in single-cell biology, which is particularly hindered by the limits of optical resolution and the density of transcripts in single cells 1-5. Here we demonstrate an evolution of sequential fluorescence in situ hybridization (seqFISH+). We show that seqFISH+ can image mRNAs for 10,000 genes in single cells-with high accuracy and sub-diffraction-limit resolution-in the cortex, subventricular zone and olfactory bulb of mouse brain, using a standard confocal microscope. The transcriptome-level profiling of seqFISH+ allows unbiased identification of cell classes and their spatial organization in tissues. In addition, seqFISH+ reveals subcellular mRNA localization patterns in cells and ligand-receptor pairs across neighbouring cells. This technology demonstrates the ability to generate spatial cell atlases and to perform discovery-driven studies of biological processes in situ.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-019-1049-y

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The lack of single-cell resolution with ST and the low sensitivity of ISS requires further technological improvements.

    “While the technologies used here do not require harsh dissociation procedures like single-cell or single-nuclei approaches and maintain spatial information, the lack of single-cell resolution with ST and the low sensitivity of ISS requires further technological improvements (Eng et al. , 2019; Rodriques et al. , 2019; Vickovic et al. , 2019; Stickels et al. , 2020).”

    From Spatial Transcriptomics and In Situ Sequencing to Study Alzheimer’s Disease (2020) · cites this paper as Eng et al., 2019

  • These methods detect up to 3,300 genes per cell in mouse brain, ~3-fold less than highest-resolution sc/snRNA-seq.

    “These methods detect up to 3,300 genes per cell in mouse brain (Eng et al., 2019), ~3-fold less than the highest-resolution sc/snRNA-seq (Yao et al., 2020a).”

    From Single-Cell Sequencing of Brain Cell Transcriptomes and Epigenomes (2021) · cites this paper as Eng et al., 2019

  • seqFISH+ can image mRNAs for 10,000 genes in single cells.

    “Sequential FISH (seqFISH+) demonstrated the ability to perform discovery-driven studies of the spatial organization of tissues with its capability of imaging mRNAs for 10,000 genes in single cells102.”
  • Multiplex fluorescence in situ hybridization (mFISH) can detect more than 100 selected genes at single-molecule resolution.

    “Multiplex fluorescence in situ hybridization (mFISH) [34,35] is another effective approach to detect senescent cells, which can detect more than 100 selected genes at single-molecule resolution.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eng, C.-H. L., Lawson, M., Zhu, Q., Dries, R., Koulena, N., Takei, Y., Yun, J., Cronin, C., Karp, C., Yuan, G.-C., & Cai, L.
Affiliations
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Cai, Long
Venue
Nature
Published
2019-03-25
Volume
568
Issue
7751
Pages
235-239
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2923300855
Cited by
1,754
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 257 · 2025: 240 · 2024: 283 · 2023: 235 · 2022: 217 · 2021: 270 · 2020: 181 · 2019: 68 · 2017: 2
FWCI
61.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (TR01 OD024686)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (UG3HL145609, U54HL145611)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH116508)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (U01DA047732)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U19NS107613)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (U01EB021240)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
Keywords
seqFISH, super-resolution imaging, single-cell transcriptomics, mRNA localization, subcellular mRNA localization, ligand-receptor interactions, subventricular zone, olfactory bulb, confocal microscopy
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Female, Ligands, Male, Organ Specificity, RNA, Messenger, 3T3 Cells, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence, Microglia, Gene Expression Profiling, Endothelial Cells, Mice, Single-Cell Analysis, Dopaminergic Neurons, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review