The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Multiphoton Excitation Provides Optical Sections from Deeper within Scattering Specimens than Confocal Imaging
Open accessAbstract
Multiphoton excitation fluorescence imaging generates an optical section of sample by restricting fluorophore excitation to the plane of focus. High photon densities, achieved only in the focal volume of the objective, are sufficient to excite the fluorescent probe molecules by density-dependent, multiphoton excitation processes. We present comparisons of confocal with multiphoton excitation imaging of identical optical sections within a sample. These side-by-side comparisons of imaging modes demonstrate a significant advantage of multiphoton imaging; data can be obtained from deeper within biological specimens. Observations on a variety of biological samples showed that in all cases there was at least a twofold improvement in the imaging penetration depth obtained with multiphoton excitation relative to confocal imaging. The more pronounced degradation in image contrast deep within a confocally imaged sample is primarily due to scattered emission photons, which reduce the signal and increase the local background as measurements of point spread functions indicated that resolution does not significantly change with increasing depth for either mode of microscopy. Multiphoton imaging does not suffer from degradation of signal-to-background to nearly the same extent as confocal imaging because this method is insensitive to scatter of the emitted signal. Direct detection of emitted photons using an external photodetector mounted close to the objective (possible only in a multiphoton imaging system) improves system sensitivity and the utilization of scattered emission photons for imaging. We demonstrate that this technique provides yet further improvements in the capability of multiphoton excitation imaging to produce good quality images from deeper within tissue relative to confocal imaging.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The third dimension bridges the gap between cell culture and live tissue
Pampaloni, F., Reynaud, E. G., & Stelzer, E. H. K. (2007) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2236 · Cited by 2,817
Collagen reorganization at the tumor-stromal interface facilitates local invasion
Provenzano, P. P., Eliceiri, K. W., Campbell, J. M., Inman, D. R., White, J. G., & Keely, P. J. (2006) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/1741-7015-4-38 · Cited by 1,804
Self-citationMultiphoton microscopy in life sciences
König, K. (2000) · Journal of Microscopy · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2818.2000.00738.x · Cited by 1,265
Principles of two-photon excitation microscopy and its applications to neuroscience
Svoboda, K., & Yasuda, R. (2006) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.05.019 · Cited by 1,027
Photobleaching in Two-Photon Excitation Microscopy
Patterson, G. H., & Piston, D. W. (2000) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(00)76762-2 · Cited by 527
Metadata
- Authors
- Centonze, V. E., & White, J. G.
- Venue
- Biophysical Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-10
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2015-2024
- ISSN
- 0006-3495 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2042194419
- Cited by
- 460
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multiphoton Excitation Provides Optical Sections from Deeper within Scattering Specimens than Confocal Imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0006-3495(98)77643-x
- The paper
- Centonze, V. E., & White, J. G. (1998). Multiphoton Excitation Provides Optical Sections from Deeper within Scattering Specimens than Confocal Imaging. Biophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3495(98)77643-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.