Cited by 1,027Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy TechniquesNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNonlinear Optical Materials Studies

Principles of two-photon excitation microscopy and its applications to neuroscience

Open access
Svoboda, Karel, Yasuda, Ryohei·2006·Neuron

Abstract

The brain is complex and dynamic. The spatial scales of interest to the neurobiologist range from individual synapses (approximately 1 microm) to neural circuits (centimeters); the timescales range from the flickering of channels (less than a millisecond) to long-term memory (years). Remarkably, fluorescence microscopy has the potential to revolutionize research on all of these spatial and temporal scales. Two-photon excitation (2PE) laser scanning microscopy allows high-resolution and high-sensitivity fluorescence microscopy in intact neural tissue, which is hostile to traditional forms of microscopy. Over the last 10 years, applications of 2PE, including microscopy and photostimulation, have contributed to our understanding of a broad array of neurobiological phenomena, including the dynamics of single channels in individual synapses and the functional organization of cortical maps. Here we review the principles of 2PE microscopy, highlight recent applications, discuss its limitations, and point to areas for future research and development.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.05.019

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two-photon microscopy rapidly became the method of choice for deep tissue imaging and has even enabled intravital brain imaging in mice.

    “Two-photon microscopy rapidly became the method of choice for deep tissue imaging and has even enabled intravital brain imaging in mice (Svoboda and Yasuda, 2006).”

    From Barriers in the brain: resolving dendritic spine morphology and compartmentalization (2014) · cites this paper as Svoboda and Yasuda, 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Svoboda, K., & Yasuda, R.
Affiliations
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
  • Svoboda, Karel
  • Yasuda, Ryohei
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-06
Volume
50
Issue
6
Pages
823-839
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2041060053
Cited by
1,027
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 75 · 2018: 75 · 2017: 67 · 2016: 60 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 48 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 65
FWCI
3.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Institutional Repository (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Burroughs Wellcome Fund
  • Dana Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nonlinear Optical Materials Studies
Keywords
two-photon microscopy, laser scanning microscopy, fluorescence microscopy, photostimulation, synapses, cortical maps, neural circuits
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Neurosciences, Microscopy, Confocal, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Multiphoton, Photobleaching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review