The DOI matches its Crossref record; 91 of the 94 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Opioid site in nucleus accumbens shell mediates eating and hedonic ‘liking’ for food: map based on microinjection Fos plumes
Abstract
Microinjection of opioid agonists, such as morphine, into the nucleus accumbens shell produces increases in eating behavior (i.e. 'wanting' for food). This study (1) reports direct evidence that activation of accumbens opioid receptors in rats also augments food 'liking', or the hedonic impact of taste, and (2) identified a neural site that definitely contains receptors capable of increasing food intake. Morphine microinjections (0.5 microgram) into accumbens shell, which caused rats to increase eating, were found also to cause selective increases in positive hedonic patterns of behavioral affective reaction elicited by oral sucrose, using the 'taste reactivity' test of hedonic palatability. This positive shift indicated that morphine microinjections enhanced the hedonic impact of food palatability. The accumbens site mediating morphine-induced increases in food 'wanting' and 'liking' was identified using a novel method based on local expression of Fos induced directly by drug microinjections. The plume-shaped region of drug-induced increase in Fos immunoreactivity immediately surrounding a morphine microinjection site (Fos plume) was objectively mapped. A point-sampling procedure was used to measure the shape and size of 'positive' plumes of Fos expression triggered by microinjections of morphine at locations that caused increases in eating behavior. This revealed a functionally 'positive' neural region, containing receptors directly activated by behaviorally-effective drug microinjections. A subtraction mapping procedure was then used to eliminate all surrounding regions containing any 'negative' Fos plumes that failed to increase food intake. The subtraction produced a conservative map of the positive site, by eliminating regions that gave mixed effects, and leaving only a positive region that must contain receptors capable of mediating increases in food intake. The resulting mapped 'opioid eating site' was contained primarily within the medial caudal subregion of the nucleus accumbens shell, and did not substantially penetrate either into the accumbens core or into other subregions of the shell. Several other structures outside the nucleus accumbens (such as rostral ventral pallidum), immediately medial and adjacent to the shell, also appeared to be included in the functional site. Opioid receptors within this site thus are capable of mediating morphine-induced increases in eating, in part by enhancing the hedonic reward properties of food.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Pharmacological control of the output from the NAc shell can also have profound effects on food consumption [312,313], as does surgical or chemical lesion of the nigrostriatal or mesolimbic DA pathways.”
From Reward circuitry dysfunction in psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders and genetic syndromes: animal models and clinical findings (2012) · cites this paper as [312]
In the citing paper
“Nonetheless, the three receptor types have different behavioral domains, with MOR and DOR mediating generally positive motivation and affect, while KOR mediates generally negative motivation and aversion (Pfeiffer et al 1986; Shippenberg et al 1987; Pecina and Berridge 2000; McLaughlin et al 2003; for reviews see Van Ree et al 2000; Le Merrer et al 2009).”
From The behavioral, anatomical and pharmacological parallels between social attachment, love and addiction (2012) · cites this paper as Pecina and Berridge 2000
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, microinjections of opiate into the nucleus accumbens increased food intake and the reward value of food (5).”
From Effects of dietary glycemic index on brain regions related to reward and craving in men (2013) · cites this paper as [5]
Citations
Cites
The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates
Palkovits, M. (1983) · Neuropeptides · doi:10.1016/0143-4179(83)90049-5 · Cited by 28,959
The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates
Paxinos, G., & Watson, C. (1983) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-63235-9 · Cited by 28,585
Well-being : the foundations of hedonic psychology
Kahneman, D. J., Diener, E. F., & Schwarz, N. (1999) · Cited by 7,472
What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience?
Berridge, K. C., & Robinson, T. E. (1998) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0165-0173(98)00019-8 · Cited by 4,127
Self-citation(1998) · Cited by 4,012
Paxinos, G. (1985) · Cited by 3,715
Gundersen, H. J. G., Bagger, P. V., Bendtsen, T. F., Evans, S. M., Korbo, L., Marcussen, N., Møller, A., Nielsen, K. N., Nyengaard, J. R., Pakkenberg, B., et al. (1988) · Apmis · doi:10.1111/j.1699-0463.1988.tb00954.x · Cited by 2,480
Food reward: brain substrates of wanting and liking
Berridge, K. C. (1996) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/0149-7634(95)00033-b · Cited by 1,901
Self-citationHerdegen, T., & Leah, J. D. (1998) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0165-0173(98)00018-6 · Cited by 1,369
The taste reactivity test. I. Mimetic responses to gustatory stimuli in neurologically normal rats
Grill, H. J., & Norgren, R. (1978) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(78)90568-1 · Cited by 1,220
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Fantino, 1988, Opiaces endogenes, palatabilite et controle de la prise alimentaire, Ann. d’Endocrinol., 49, 125
- Grill, 1985, Taste reactivity as a measure of the neural control of palatability, Vol. 11, 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–403 of 403
Mahler, S. M. (2009) · Deep Blue (University of Michigan)
Association Tests of the Opioid Receptor System and Alcohol-Related Traits
Bennett, R. T. (2009) · VCU Scholars Compass (Virginia Commonwealth University) · doi:10.25772/bw5h-qp43
Psychophysical aspects of retronasal chemosensory perception
Wilkes, F. J. (2006)
Metadata
- Authors
- Peciña, S., & Berridge, K. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Berridge, Kent C
- ORCID
- Berridge, Kent C
- Venue
- Brain Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-04
- Volume
- 863
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 71-86
- ISSN
- 0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2053400076
- Cited by
- 405
- References
- 94
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 4.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Brain Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
- Keywords
- nucleus accumbens shell, opioid receptors, morphine, dietary intake, food liking, desire to eat, taste reactivity, functional mapping, reward, dietary habits
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Brain Mapping, Drug Interactions, Eating, Male, Microinjections, Morphine, Narcotics, Nucleus Accumbens, Receptors, Opioid, Reward, Sucrose, Taste, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-fos, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review